Javascript is not enabled.

Javascript must be enabled to use this site. Please enable Javascript in your browser and try again.

Skip to content
Content starts here
CLOSE ×
Search
CLOSE ×
Search
Leaving AARP.org Website

You are now leaving AARP.org and going to a website that is not operated by AARP. A different privacy policy and terms of service will apply.

Nursing Home Staffing Mandate Delayed

‘One Big Beautiful Bill Act’ puts off the requirement by nearly a decade, as other changes loom


people walking down a hall in a nursing home
Rebecca Blackwell/AP Photo

Understaffed facilities, higher medical debts, reduced long-term care coverage. The nation’s 1.2 million nursing home residents and their families could see these problems intensify under the sweeping tax and domestic policy law signed earlier this month. ​

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed by President Donald Trump on July 4, delays federal standards designed to improve staffing at nursing homes by nearly a decade. Chronic understaffing in these facilities is a widespread issue in the U.S. that often leads to neglect, abuse and even death of residents. The new standards could save about 13,000 lives per year, according to research by the University of Pennsylvania. ​

The delay in the standards’ implementation is “damaging and devastating for many residents,” says AARP’s Lauren Ryan, a government affairs director focused on federal nursing home policy. ​

The law’s cuts to Medicaid, the health insurance program for low-income Americans, including roughly 17 million people ages 50 and older, are causing further worry. Cost-cutting provisions, including reduced retroactive coverage, new long-term care eligibility restrictions and delays to enrollment system improvements, are likely to affect nursing home residents too. ​

“Those are provisions that are explicitly very bad for nursing home residents,” says Sam Brooks, director of public policy at the National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care. “But the overall bill and its huge cuts to Medicaid is really going to reshape how nursing home and other long-term care is provided in this country — and not for the better.” ​

Join Our Fight for Caregivers

Here’s what you can do to support family caregivers:

  • Sign up to become part of AARP’s online advocacy network and urge lawmakers to pass legislation to save caregivers time and money.
  • Find out more about how we’re fighting for you every day in Congress and across the country.
  • AARP is your fierce defender on the issues that matter to people age 50-plus. Become a member or renew your membership today. ​​

Cuts to Medicaid in the new law total $911 billion through 2034, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). Medicaid is the largest payer of nursing home care costs in the U.S., covering most of the nursing home bill for more than 6 in 10 residents, according to an analysis by KFF, a nonprofit focused on health policy research and polling.

​​Plenty of uncertainty remains around how changes set out in the new law will affect nursing home residents. How state governments, which jointly fund Medicaid with the federal government, will respond to the legislation is also still largely unknown, but it will be influential.

​​“What we do know is that there’s going to be a big loss of federal funding and states are going to have to make decisions on whether they fill the gaps or cut benefits and services in order to balance their own budgets,” says Priya Chidambaram, a senior policy manager at KFF researching Medicaid and America’s uninsured. “It’s highly likely that every state will react differently.” ​

Here is a breakdown of some of the changes that could affect the country’s nursing home residents.

Mandatory staffing standards on hold

In 2024, the Biden administration finalized new minimum federal staffing standards for the nation’s 15,000 nursing homes — the first of their kind. The standards require a registered nurse on-site at all times, plus a minimum of 3.48 hours of direct nursing care per resident per day – at least 0.55 hours from a registered nurse and 2.45 hours from a nurse’s aide.

​When the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) finalized the standards in 2024, those minimums were deemed by the agency as “essential” to providing residents with “safe, high-quality care while being treated with dignity.” AARP championed the standards, noting that more staff was linked to higher quality of care in nursing homes. ​

The staffing rule was slated to go in full effect for almost all nursing home facilities by May 2029 through a staggered implementation plan. But the new law postpones implementation until October 2034. ​

This means most nursing home residents are unlikely to receive adequate care before then. Less than 1 in 5 facilities met all three of the direct nursing care staffing standards in the final months of 2023, according to KFF. And not much progress has been made since then, says KFF’s Chidambaram. ​

Some other parts of CMS’s original staffing rule have not been delayed by the new law. For example, states will still have to meet new transparency requirements, including reporting the percentage of Medicaid payments spent on pay to direct care workers and support staff in nursing homes and publicly disclosing facilities’ staffing levels. Also, nursing homes will still be required to perform more robust facility assessments that better focus on residents’ needs and to create staffing plans that meet those needs. ​

That’s little consolation, though, says National Consumer Voice’s Brooks. “The real meat of the rule isn’t there now,” he says, “and the legacy of that is literally going to be tens of thousands of deaths and more suffering for hundreds and thousands of older Americans who continue to reside in nursing homes that don’t have adequate staffing.”

Reduced retroactive Medicaid coverage

Before the new law passed, people could get coverage for nursing home care and other medical expenses incurred three months before they applied for Medicaid. Under the new law, this timing would narrow to one month prior to application for Medicaid expansion enrollees and two months prior for traditional enrollees. Most nursing home residents are traditional enrollees. ​

Retroactive Medicaid coverage is crucial to preventing low-income Americans from accumulating huge medical bills for services received before they apply for Medicaid. The change could lead to financial hardship for nursing home residents and their families, warns AARP’s Rhonda Richards, a government affairs director focused on long-term care. ​

“One month’s worth of nursing home care can be very expensive,” Richards says — roughly $8,700 a month, based on KFF’s estimated costs for a semiprivate room in 2023.

New home equity limit for Medicaid eligibility

Medicaid has specific financial rules for people who want to qualify for long-term care coverage, including nursing home care. ​

To be eligible for Medicaid-covered nursing home care, your home equity — how much your home is worth, minus any loans or mortgages — can’t exceed the federal limit of $500,000 (which, adjusted to inflation, is $730,000 in 2025) or an upper limit of $750,000 (which, adjusted to inflation, is $1,097,000 in 2025) if a state has chosen to set that higher limit. ​

Under the new law, however, that limit will be capped at $1 million in home equity for most properties, starting in 2028, with no adjustments for inflation.

​While most states don’t currently have home equity limits over $1 million, the provision is likely to reduce the number of people who qualify for Medicaid-covered nursing home care over time. As home values rise, many states have increased home equity limits, says KFF’s Chidambaram. With the new federal cap, this will no longer be an option.

Delays to Medicaid enrollment improvements

​The majority of the country’s 1.2 million nursing home residents have both Medicaid, which pays for their long-term care, and Medicare, which pays for other medical care, like hospital stays and doctor visits. ​

Enrolling in and maintaining this “dual-eligible” health care coverage has often been administratively challenging for nursing home residents and states. After the COVID-19 pandemic, many people enrolled in both programs lost Medicaid coverage for procedural reasons and not because they were ineligible. ​

To curb this problem, CMS issued two separate rules, under the Biden administration, intended to make it easier for people to enroll in and renew Medicaid coverage. Collectively, they are referred to as the eligibility and enrollment final rule. AARP advocated for both. ​

The new law recently signed by Trump, however, prohibits the implementation of both rules until October 2034. The delay is likely to perpetuate the existing administrative challenges for nursing home residents as they try to access and maintain Medicaid coverage, Chidambaram says. The CBO estimates that the delay will reduce the number of dual-eligible beneficiaries by 1.3 million through 2034.

Unlock Access to AARP Members Edition

Join AARP to Continue

Already a Member?

Red AARP membership card displayed at an angle

Join AARP for just $15 for your first year when you sign up for automatic renewal. Gain instant access to exclusive products, hundreds of discounts and services, a free second membership, and a subscription to AARP The Magazine.