Javascript is not enabled.

Javascript must be enabled to use this site. Please enable Javascript in your browser and try again.

Skip to content
Content starts here
CLOSE ×
Search
CLOSE ×
Search
Leaving AARP.org Website

You are now leaving AARP.org and going to a website that is not operated by AARP. A different privacy policy and terms of service will apply.

How Your Savings Can Get You a Bigger Social Security Payout

A ‘bridge strategy’ to delay your benefit claim could make your money last longer, but few retirees try it


two people carrying golf clubs walk across a waterway on paths of dollar bills. the path leads to a social security card
Glenn Harvey

David Johnston’s clients worry. They worry about drawing down their hard-won retirement savings and having to pay taxes on that money when they do. They worry about keeping cash on hand for a rainy day. They worry about having something left to leave to their loved ones.

“I totally get it,” says Johnston, a certified financial planner and partner at New Jersey-based OnePoint BFG Wealth Partners. “They’ve spent all their lives saving. They like seeing the statements. It gives them a sense of comfort.”

But Johnston, along with a growing number of financial planners and policy analysts, is urging people nearing retirement to think about those savings — 401(k)s, IRAs, investments — in a new light, one that involves leaning on those funds in their first years after leaving work.

The reason is simple: The longer you can afford to delay filing for Social Security, up to age 70, the bigger your monthly retirement benefit will be.

“You have to show them the math,” Johnston says. “If you have resources elsewhere that can tide you over, it’s going to be in your best interest to wait.”

That math shows that holding off until age 70 to file for retirement benefits will result in a 77 percent larger monthly payment than if you claim at 62, the earliest age of eligibility. Locking in higher benefits can be especially important as lifespans get longer, because, unlike retirement savings, these benefits are guaranteed to last for life and are adjusted annually to keep up with inflation.

Join Our Fight to Protect Social Security​​

You’ve worked hard and paid into Social Security with every paycheck. Here’s what you can do to help keep Social Security strong:

The average life expectancy for a U.S. adult who reaches age 65 is approximately 83 for men and 86 for women. If you live that long, or longer, your assets will go further if you use them to delay claiming Social Security, because the bigger Social Security payments will reduce your need to tap savings, according to a July 2025 study from the Bipartisan Policy Center (BPC), a Washington, D.C.–based think tank.

‘It’s pretty basic’

The idea behind what financial professionals call a Social Security “bridge strategy” is to leverage retirement savings to carry you to that later Social Security claim.

“It’s pretty basic,” says JoePat Roop, founder and president of Belmont Capital Advisors in Belmont, North Carolina. “We can take dollars from taxable accounts to help [people] pay their bills during that phase.”

But while the bridge strategy is gaining attention in planning circles, it’s a tough sell for many older adults, says Emerson Sprick, director of retirement and labor policy at the BPC and the author of the July study.

“There’s a lot of psychology that goes into people’s unwillingness to start chipping away at this nest egg they’ve spent their lifetimes accumulating,” Sprick says. “The system is really good at helping people accumulate assets and really bad at helping people stop saving who need to start spending.”

Instead of tapping into savings to bolster their future benefits, more people are claiming Social Security earlier, in large part over concerns about the program’s financial health, according to recent research by the Urban Institute and AARP. The latest annual report from Social Security’s trustees projects that the program’s trust funds will run short in 2034, leading to a 19 percent cut in benefits unless Congress acts to shore up the system.

Sprick says he’s confident lawmakers will act to avert such a shortfall. But whether or not you agree, it still likely makes sense to delay filing for Social Security until 70, he says. Even if overall benefits are reduced, that’s still when you’ll get your biggest possible monthly benefit. With those higher payments, he says, you ultimately may need less in savings for your given lifestyle or expenditure level.

“If [people] are looking at how to maximize the total amount of Social Security benefits that they will receive in the course of their retirement, delaying is almost always going to be better than claiming earlier,” Sprick says.

Another advantage of delaying Social Security is that it’s indexed to inflation. Unlike retirement and investment accounts, which are tied to the prices of stocks, bonds and commodities, Social Security payments rise with consumer prices through annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs).

Past COLAs are rolled into the benefit you get when you claim, and the bigger that benefit, the more it will grow with future COLAs. “We financial advisers can’t give a guaranteed increase in returns” like that, Roop says.

Budgeting for a bridge

Is a bridge strategy right for you? Your overall health and longevity are crucial factors to consider. If you have, or are at risk for, any chronic medical conditions, you may want to preserve more of your savings for mounting medical costs. The BPC study notes that concern about future health or long-term care needs is one of the chief reasons many retirees want to keep accumulating assets rather than depleting them.

“Part of the analysis of whether it’s good for you to do it is you have to take into account what you have on the horizon,” Johnston says. For example, he asks clients if they have long-term care insurance. If the answer is yes, having a sizable emergency fund might be less of a priority since the policy will cover some care costs.

You can apply a similar test — less savings versus more guaranteed income — to other retirement and estate plans, Johnston says. “What are your travel plans? Do you want to leave money to your kids? Do you plan to sell your house?” he asks.

If globetrotting or a big inheritance are priorities, for example, you might want to leave your nest egg more or less intact. But selling a home can restore assets you’ve drawn down as part of a bridge strategy.

Equally important is how much you’ll spend on regular living expenses and how much you’ll need to withdraw from retirement accounts to cover them during the bridge period. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ most recent Consumer Expenditure Survey, Americans 65-plus spend about $60,000 a year, on average, on food, shelter, utilities, health care and other routine costs.

The key to the bridge strategy is that the difference between what you get from Social Security and what you need from other sources to meet your spending needs narrows considerably the later benefits are claimed.

Take a hypothetical worker categorized by Social Security as a medium earner (average annual income of about $66,000 in today’s dollars) who aims to replace 80 percent of their income in retirement, a standard target recommended by financial planners. According to Sprick’s study, they would use up less of their assets over the course of retirement by using savings rather than Social Security to cover their “unmet need” for income in the early years of retirement.

If they live to an average life expectancy or beyond, the report says, the greater benefit would more than compensate for the early drawdown.

Taxing questions

There are other considerations, notably the tax implications of large withdrawals from retirement accounts.

For example, you’ll pay federal income tax on all the money you take out of traditional IRAs and 401(k)s (qualified withdrawals from Roth accounts are not taxable), whereas you’ll never pay taxes on more than 85 percent of your Social Security income. (Most beneficiaries are taxed on less than that, or not at all.) In addition, 37 states tax retirement account distributions, and only nine tax Social Security. That’s something else to factor into your budgeting for a bridge strategy.

Keep in mind, however, that you can’t hoard money in retirement accounts forever, no matter your strategy for balancing savings and Social Security. IRS rules generally require retirees to make a minimum withdrawal annually from traditional IRAs and 401(k)s starting at age 73.

The amount of these required minimum distributions, or RMDs, is determined by your age, life expectancy and the value of your retirement savings. They are taxable as income, and failing to take one in full can trigger an additional 25 percent tax penalty.

“For those people who have really large 401(k) and IRA plans, they have a little bit of this ticking tax time bomb,” Johnston says. All the better reason for the bridge plan, he says, because tapping into this money earlier “reduces your RMDs later on.”

The decline of workplace pensions as a pillar of retirement security, at least in the private sector, increases the importance of guaranteed income streams such as Social Security, the BPC report notes. Research has shown that most U.S. adults are unsure of, or underestimate, their life expectancy and don’t have a plan for mitigating the “longevity risk” of outliving their money, the BPC study found.

Addressing that through a bridge strategy “requires turning a lump sum that you’ve spent your entire life accumulating into an income stream, and that’s really scary,” Sprick says. “But if you’re looking at how you maximize the total amount of Social Security benefits that you will receive in the course of your retirement, delaying claiming to maximize your monthly benefit is still almost always the right call.”

Unlock Access to AARP Members Edition

Join AARP to Continue

Already a Member?