AARP Hearing Center
If you lived in the United States on May 15, 1985, the odds were pretty good that you were watching Dynasty that night. Not necessarily because you were a fan or had been following the Carrington family’s drama all season, but because more than 20 million people were going to be watching.
I was 16 and had absolutely no business caring about Dynasty. My shows were Miami Vice and Cheers. Dynasty was my parents’ show, a prime-time soap opera about obscenely wealthy oil people in Denver who wore shoulder pads to breakfast and feuded in ball gowns. It was not aimed at teenage boys who owned a Clash album.
But that spring, something had shifted, some critical-mass moment when the show stopped being a thing your parents watched and became a thing everyone watched. Kids at school talked about it. Teachers talked about it. The man who ran the hardware store talked about it.
“TV was a way to feel like you still had a pipeline to social connections and the wider world,” says Christine Becker, a professor of television at the University of Notre Dame who studies that era. “So it was as much about public connections as it was about private escapes.”
There were four sweeps periods every year — February, May, July and November — but May set the summer in motion. If you missed the episode, you missed the summer.
So we watched. All of us, together, which in my house meant my parents on the couch, me in the armchair and my little brother on the floor. My mother made popcorn and put it in the big orange bowl we only used for company.
This was a binding social contract we’d entered into without discussing it, because there was no pause button, no rewind, no way to retrieve a moment once it passed. Whatever was going to happen — and something enormous was clearly going to happen — you were either there for it or you spent the next day nodding along to a conversation you couldn’t participate in.
David Bianculli, a professor of television studies at Rowan University and TV critic for NPR’s Fresh Air, thinks we “lost something as a culture” when this model broke apart. “The connection, and enjoyment, of reacting to and discussing television events as they happen: That’s something that was taken for granted in the first 50 years of television but that we’ll never get back.”
Live sports is the last place where something like the old feeling still exists, where a significant portion of the country is watching the same thing at the same moment and the result is genuinely unknown. But even that is fracturing now, spread across broadcast networks, cable packages and streaming deals that put different games behind different paywalls.
What we had during sweeps season was something simpler and, it turns out, irreplaceable. To honor the memory, we revisit our favorite sweeps across the decades.
The shocking death
In which the networks discover that killing a character audiences loved is more powerful than any cliffhanger, because a cliffhanger could still resolve happily. A death could not.
Seinfeld, ‘The Invitations,’ May 16, 1996
George Costanza (Jason Alexander) spent an entire season trying to get out of his engagement to Susan (Heidi Swedberg), a woman he had no interest in marrying. He failed repeatedly. And he cheaped out on the wedding invitations. Unbeknownst to George, the low-quality envelopes contained toxic glue, which killed Susan after she licked them.
When George arrived at the hospital and learned she was gone, he and his friends received the news with the kind of mild, slightly relieved indifference that made the moment one of the most audacious things a sitcom had ever done.
You Might Also Like
How Your Favorite TV Shows Shaped Your Identity
The television you loved as a kid was a blueprint for your adulthood
Why Older Women Love Young Adult Shows
We’re drawn to these series because they let us relive the electric rush of first love
When Sid Caesar Redefined American Comedy
His time at the top didn’t last long. But his influence is still felt today