Take control of your brain health with Staying Sharp! Try it today.
by Jana Lynott, Sandra Rosenbloom, PhD, University of Arizona, Public Policy Institute, December 2011
This AARP Public Policy Institute report by Sandra Rosenbloom of the University of Arizona and AARP’s Jana Lynott examines whether current and proposed transportation funding sources at all three levels of government are in some way inequitable for low-income people, rural residents, people with disabilities, or older adults. Overall, older and retired travelers make different demands on the transportation network and have very different needs than the average system user. Any taxes and fees that don’t account for these differences may be inequitable. Those that are regressive—taking a larger share of income from low-income persons than higher-income persons—raise ability to pay equity concerns for low-income travelers of any age.
Older and retired people, on average, make fewer trips, travel fewer miles, travel less on Interstate highways, and travel less in peak periods than those who are younger. Yet most current financing mechanisms at the federal, state, and local levels do not reflect key differences in how older people use the surface transportation system. Most are regressive.
To equitably provide transportation services, whether or not the revenue sources were equitably raised, the government must ensure that those services are structured and delivered in ways that specifically meet the issues faced by people with special needs. Government policy at all levels must seek to expand, improve, and enhance a wide range of transportation infrastructure, facilities, and services, with a clear and specific focus on the needs of older and retired people. Increased investment in public and community-based transportation options, highway modifications, driver assessment and training, pedestrian facilities, and attention to urban design and land use policies would help to ensure that those who pay receive their fair share of benefits.
The lack of sufficient transportation revenue has posed a stumbling block for Congress which must reauthorize the multibillion-dollar federal transportation law, which expired in fall 2009. Given the national debate over alternatives to the gas tax, and the wide variety of new or expanded financing mechanisms being adopted at the state and local levels of government, this is an opportune time to examine the equity of various transportation taxes, fees, and charges and look for ways to address inequities while meeting the needs of an aging society.
Please leave your comment below.
You must be logged in to leave a comment.
You are leaving AARP.org and going to the website of our trusted provider. The provider’s terms, conditions and policies apply. Please return to AARP.org to learn more about other benefits.
Your email address is now confirmed.
Manage your email preferences and tell us which topics interest you so that we can prioritize the information you receive.
Explore all that AARP has to offer.
In the next 24 hours, you will receive an email to confirm your subscription to receive emails
related to AARP volunteering. Once you confirm that subscription, you will regularly
receive communications related to AARP volunteering. In the meantime, please feel free
to search for ways to make a difference in your community at