Medicare Part D Plans Are on Diverging Paths

Medicare Part D plans have been subject to numerous changes and challenges since the program was implemented in 2006. In some ways, plans appear to have responded similarly; however, they have also diverged in important ways. The long-term trends highlighted in this report also suggest that recent Part D plan market changes reflect a confluence of factors. Future efforts to reform Medicare Part D should reflect the reality that Part D plans are increasingly distinct and ensure that Medicare beneficiaries retain the ability to choose the coverage option that works best for them. Read the full report.

• Medicare beneficiaries who want Part D coverage can enroll in either a stand-alone prescription drug plan (PDP) that covers only prescription drugs or a Medicare Advantage plan that provides all Medicare-covered benefits, including prescription drugs (MA-PD).
• PDPs and MA-PDs must contend with similar challenges, including rising prescription drug prices and numerous regulatory and legislative changes that have occurred since the Part D program was implemented in 2006.
• Closer examination of key Part D plan characteristics indicates that PDPs and MA-PDs have responded differently to these challenges, leading to a significant divergence in plan offerings over time.
• These differences are likely due to the availability of rebates that Medicare pays MA plans that allow MA-PDs to absorb the costs associated with more generous prescription drug coverage and still offer comparatively low premiums. PDPs do not receive similar rebates.
• Policymakers should recognize that PDPs and MA-PDs are increasingly distinct and should ensure that Medicare beneficiaries retain affordable access to the coverage option that works best for them.

Some text elements of this page were created with AI assistance and have been reviewed and edited for accuracy by staff.