Basing Per Enrollee Caps on Historical Medicaid Spending Just Does Not...

Lynda Flowers, AARP Public Policy Institute

Ari Houser, AARP Public Policy Institute

Published July 29, 2016

By all measures, the per enrollee cap proposal in the BCRA falls short, beginning with the setting of the baseline. It would likely result in immediate cuts to state Medicaid programs, it is inadequate to meet the needs of a rapidly changing demographic, and it is likely to take away the ability of many states to make changes in their Medicaid policies.

MORE FROM AARP

Medical Frailty Exemption and Coverage Risks

Under new rules, midlife adults with serious conditions may struggle to qualify for a medical frailty exemption, putting Medicaid coverage and access to lifesaving care at risk.

Female doctor in scrubs consulting with senior woman in exam room

Data Visualization: Older Adults Ages 50-64 Who Rely on Medicaid Expansion

Millions of adults ages 50–64 rely on ACA Medicaid expansion for essential health coverage across states and districts.

Medicare Costs and Financial Outlook

Medicare cost trends include projected premium increases, trust fund outlook details, and key factors affecting spending and out-of-pocket costs for enrollees.

Work Requirements for SNAP and Medicaid

New and expanded SNAP and Medicaid work requirements may affect adults ages 50 to 64 who participate in both programs.

Medicaid Cost Sharing Changes Under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA)

This overview outlines Medicaid cost sharing policies and how recent federal changes shape state decisions and enrollee protections.

Basing Per Enrollee Caps on Historical Medicaid Spending Just Does Not Work

Insight on the Issues

Full Report