About Us
Case Name: Brown v. District of Columbia
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Docket: 10-2250
Read the Court’s decision and press release here.
Issued: December 31, 2024
Case Issues: The Court issued a resounding judgment for the plaintiff class, finding that the District of Columbia has violated the rights of D.C. residents with disabilities under the integration mandate of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Court ordered the District to take several steps, including developing a working system of transition assistance, to ensure that it was serving people with disabilities in the most integrated settings.
Case Name: Mark H. Goldstein v. RTX Corporation (f/k/a Raytheon Technologies Corporation)
Court: United States District Court for the District of Delaware
Case No.: 1:24-cv-01169
Read AARP's Complaint (PDF)
Filed: November 20, 2024
Case Issues: Does Raytheon’s practice of reserving positions exclusively for recent graduates discriminate against older workers in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Massachusetts Fair Employment Practices Act, and the Virginia Human Rights Act?
Case Name: Fitzmorris, et al. v. Weaver
Court: US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Case No.: 23-8047
Read Complaint and Order (PDF)
Filed: February 21, 2024
Case Issues: The Court has denied the defendants’ appeal of the district court’s grant of class certification. The denial of the appeal allows our litigation to proceed to benefit low-income older people and people with disabilities who face discrimination based on their disability and age.
Case Name: John Doe #1, et al. v. Alden Group Ltd, et al.
Court: Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Chancery Division
Docket: Case No. 22-CH-9574
Read AARP's Complaint (PDF)
Filed: January 30, 2024
Case Issues: Does the Alden Group and its facilities neglect residents and put them at risk of harm by failing to provide care that meets the residents’ needs through systematic and intentional understaffing in violation of the Illinois Nursing Home Care Act and the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act?
Case Name: Real Women in Trucking v. Meta Platforms, Inc.,
Forum: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
EEOC Charge No.: 570-2023-00655
Read AARP's Press Release (PDF) Notice of Appearance (PDF)
Noticed: December 19, 2023
Case Issues: Whether Meta’s ad-delivery algorithm violates the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and Title VII by relying on age and gender in the delivery of its job advertisements, thereby excluding older adults from many job advertisements and perpetuating gender stereotypes about which gender will be interested in a particular job (i.e., only older men receive mechanic and truck driving ads and only older women receive administrative assistant and caregiving ads).
Case Name: Margaret Bobb v. Finepoints Private Duty Healthcare, LLC, et al
Court: United States District Court for the District Of Maryland
Docket: Case No. 1:23-cv-03129
