DONATE

Be part of the solution.

Help AARP Foundation win back opportunity for struggling Americans 50 and over.

Charity Rating

AARP Foundation earns high rating for accountability from a leading charity evaluator. Read

Connect with the
Foundation

Email:

foundation@aarp.org


AARP Foundation Litigation:

202-434-2060


Toll-free Nationwide:

888-OUR-AARP

(888-687-2277)

 

Toll-free TTY:

877-434-7598

 

AARP Foundation Tax ID

52-0794300

NAFA v. Perez

Court Upholds the Department of Labor's Conflict of Interest Regulation

    

The District Court for the District of Columbia issued its decision in Nat'l Assoc. of Fixed Annuities (NAFA) v. Perez, handing the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) its first victory in the legal challenges to its conflict of interest rule for retirement investment advisers.

Background

NAFA filed a lawsuit in federal district court challenging several elements of a rule released in April by DOL that strengthened consumer protections for all retirement plan investors. First, it challenged the DOL’s decision to replace the five-part test set forth in the 1975 regulation with a new definition of “fiduciary,” and, in particular, the DOL’s decision to discard the “on a regular basis” limitation. Second, it challenged the DOL’s decision to require that financial institutions and advisers who are providing advice regarding investments held in IRAs comply with the duties of loyalty and prudence in order to qualify for the Class Exemptions. Third, it challenged the written contract requirement contained in the Best Interest Contract (BIC) Exemption on the theory that it impermissibly creates a private cause of action. Fourth, it challenged the BIC Exemption on the ground that the “reasonable compensation” condition is void for vagueness. Fifth, it challenged the DOL’s decision to move fixed indexed annuities from one class exemption to the BIC Exemption as arbitrary and capricious. Finally, it challenged the rules on the ground that the DOL’s regulatory impact analysis was inadequate.

The judge rejected each of these arguments in his 92-page decision. He denied NAFA's motion for a temporary block of the rule, and granted the DOL's motion for summary judgment.

What’s at Stake?


Upholding the regulation will require investment advisors working on retirement plan accounts to operate in the “best interest” of customers. This may save individuals a significant amount of money in hidden fees, undisclosed commissions and investment product sales that are not in their best interest, resulting in more money in their retirement accounts.

Case Status

In NAFA v. Perez, the District Court for the District of Columbia upheld the DOL’s conflict of interest rule, holding that the DOL followed the necessary process for issuing its Rule. NAFA announced that it is appealing the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and seeking expedited review.

Search Legal Advocacy

Find
Legal Cases

Find cases in which AFL has advocated in courts nationwide for the rights of older persons, and filed AARP’s amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs that help courts decide precedent-setting cases. The cases within the drop-down categories below are in alphabetical order for ease of searching.

Strengthening Law and Policy through
Legal Advocacy

Our legal advocacy initiatives  - conducted by AARP Foundation Litigation (AFL) - reflect nearly 20 years of work in federal and state courts across the country. Through our efforts, we support the Foundation’s four impact areas: Tackling Senior Hunger, Paving the Way to Stable Income, assuring the adequacy and availability of Safe and Afffordable Housing and Reconnecting People to Families and Communities, and ensure that those 50 and older have a voice in the laws and policies that affect their daily lives.