Be part of the solution.

Help AARP Foundation win back opportunity for struggling Americans 50 and over.

Charity Rating

AARP Foundation earns high rating for accountability from a leading charity evaluator. Read

Connect with the


AARP Foundation Litigation:


Toll-free Nationwide:




Toll-free TTY:



AARP Foundation Tax ID


Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice

AARP Urges U.S. Supreme Court Not to Extend Securities Law Exemptions to CDs


The Supreme Court is considering the reach of federal securities protections.


Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice is one of three cases consolidated in the now-captioned Roland v. Green litigation. The three suits involve a multi-billion dollar Ponzi scheme perpetrated by R. Allen Stanford through various corporate entities. The scheme involved the sale of fraudulently marketed Certificates of Deposit (CDs) that were rife with misrepresentations.

The question was whether these CDs met the definition of securities under the federal Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (SLUSA) – if so, they were exempt from fraud claims brought under state anti-fraud laws seeking recourse for misrepresentations, omissions, and fraud.  A trial court found that while they were not technically covered securities, the CDs walked and talked like securities and thus were SLUSA covered. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit disagreed, ruling that the trial court had too broadly extended SLUSA’s coverage.

AARP’s friend-of-the-court brief, filed by AARP Foundation Litigation attorneys in conjunction with two investor advocacy organizations, urges the Court to uphold the appellate court’s ruling. Allowing issuers of private investment vehicles like these CDs to invoke the protection of SLUSA would not advance the purposes of SLUSA (which is to provide uniformity in securities market enforcement), would only create additional obstacles for defrauded investors, and undermine the role of state-based private securities laws in protecting investors from ever-changing fraudulent investment schemes.

What’s at Stake

With the increase in private offerings anticipated in the coming years, following federal law encouraging business startups, investors need all the tools at their disposal to enforce their rights against fraud and misrepresentation. Extending SLUSA to CDs would create a tremendous loophole and leave private individuals without important state law protections.

Case Status

Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice
is before the U.S. Supreme Court,

Search Legal Advocacy

Legal Cases

Find cases in which AFL has advocated in courts nationwide for the rights of older persons, and filed AARP’s amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs that help courts decide precedent-setting cases. The cases within the drop-down categories below are in alphabetical order for ease of searching.

Strengthening Law and Policy through
Legal Advocacy

Our legal advocacy initiatives  - conducted by AARP Foundation Litigation (AFL) - reflect nearly 20 years of work in federal and state courts across the country. Through our efforts, we support the Foundation’s four impact areas: Tackling Senior Hunger, Paving the Way to Stable Income, assuring the adequacy and availability of Safe and Afffordable Housing and Reconnecting People to Families and Communities, and ensure that those 50 and older have a voice in the laws and policies that affect their daily lives.