Alert
Close

Last chance! Play brain games for a chance to win $25,000. Enter the Brain Health Sweepstakes

Donate

Be part of the solution.

Help AARP Foundation win back opportunity for struggling Americans 50 and over.

Charity Ratings

AARP Foundation earns high ratings for accountability and transparency from two leading charity evaluators. Read

Sign Up for Our
Newsletter

View Current Issue

The AARP Foundation Litigation Update, our quarterly email newsletter, provides information about our current activities and cases.

Connect with the
Foundation

Email:

foundation@aarp.org

 

Toll-free Nationwide:

888-OUR-AARP

(888-687-2277)

 

Toll-free TTY:

877-434-7598

AARP Foundation Legal Advocacy

Docket: Health

    

Case Name: APOTEX, Inc. v. Sebelius

Court: U.S. Supreme Court   Docket: No. 10-453

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: Petition for certiorari denied on decision which narrowly interpreted forfeiture provision of Hatch-Waxman Act.

Case Name: Ass'n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics

Oral argument scheduled for April 15, 2013.

Court: U.S. Supreme Court    Docket: 12-398 

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Briefs:

U. S. Supreme Court (12-398) Brief 1 (PDF), Brief 2 (PDF), U.S. Supreme Court (11-725) (PDF), U.S. Ct. App. Fed. Cir. (2010-1406) Brief 1 and Brief 2  (PDF) 

Watch PBS NewsHour video Can Genes Be Patented?

Case Issue: Are human genes patentable?

Case Name: Astra USA v. Santa Clara

Court: U.S. Supreme Court     Docket: 09-1273

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Can public health facilities (known as 340B entities) sue pharmaceutical companies for breach of contract as third-party beneficiaries when companies improperly charged prices higher than the amount they agreed to charge under an agreement with HHS as a condition of participation in Medicaid?

Case Name: Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery v. Nestlehutt

Court: Ga. Supreme Ct.    Docket: S091432

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: Court ruled that the State's cap on non-economic damages violates state's constitution because it deprives citizens of equal protection under the law and interferes with the right to have a jury decide damage amounts.

Case Name: Ball v. Betlach (formerly Rodgers)

Court: U.S. Dist. Ct. Az.    Docket: CV-00-67

Read Summary

Case Result: In settlement, state agreed to deliver critical home and community based services as scheduled; remedy any gaps in service within two hours; maintain backup workers to cover gaps; keep a 800 line available for reporting gaps in service; report monthly on level of gaps in service; and pay attorneys fees and costs.

Some of the content presented here is in Adobe PDF format. You will need the free Acrobat Reader to access these files.

Topic Alerts

You can get weekly email alerts on the topics below. Just click “Follow.”

Manage Alerts

Processing

Please wait...

progress bar, please wait
  • Text
  • Print
  • Recommend

Search Legal Advocacy

Find
Legal Cases

Find the most recent cases in which AFL has advocated in courts nationwide for the rights of older persons, and filed AARP’s amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs that help courts decide precedent-setting cases.

About
Foundation Litigation

AARP Foundation Litigation (AFL) is an advocate in courts nationwide for the rights of people 50 and older, addressing diverse legal issues that affect their daily lives and assuring that they have a voice in the judicial system. Learn more about our litigation teams.