Join AARP's Live Coronavirus Tele-Town Hall at 1 p.m. ET Thursday. Learn more.
by Carole Fleck, AARP Bulletin, August 31, 2010
Americans apparently are not that interested in learning whether they have a genetic disposition to certain diseases like breast cancer, Alzheimer's or diabetes, despite scientific advances in the last decade, according to a new AARP Bulletin genetic testing poll.
More than two-thirds of respondents (70 percent) say they wouldn't consider genetic testing to determine whether they're at increased risk for developing specific inherited diseases. Nearly one-third (32 percent) cite the cost, and 21 percent say they don't want to know the results, the poll found.
One in five say they're concerned that their results may fall into the hands of someone else. More than one in 10 say they're skeptical of the science involved in genetic testing, according to the survey of 1,000 people age 18 and older.
It was a decade ago in June that scientists unveiled a map of the human genome, which made testing to determine one's susceptibility to certain genetic diseases possible. To date, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, genetic tests have been developed for more than 1,700 diseases—from rare disorders like Duchenne muscular dystrophy to inherited gene mutations responsible for some breast and ovarian cancers.
But there are limitations to the tests. For example, a positive result for a genetic mutation doesn't guarantee that a disease will develop. Likewise, a negative result doesn't mean a person won't get a certain disorder.
Kate Convery, 52, of Bethel Park, Pa., says she'd only consider genetic testing "if there was some kind of childhood genetic disease in my family, like cystic fibrosis. I probably wouldn't do it for diabetes or breast cancer."
"I live a healthy life, I exercise and I eat well so I guess I just don't see a value in it for me," she says. "I don't think of myself as that susceptible to disease. Maybe it's just denial, but nobody wants to think they'll get sick from anything."
What if a genetic test showed that a person could live to be 100? Here's how respondents say that information would influence their behavior:
Interestingly, more than one-third (35 percent) say they wouldn't change a thing.
Carole Fleck is a senior editor at the AARP Bulletin and has had genetic testing.
Please leave your comment below.
You must be logged in to leave a comment.
Enter address, city, state, or ZIP code.
Driver Safety (0)
Tax Aide (0)
Entertainment & Dining (0)
Healthcare & Insurance (0)
Financial Services & Insurance (0)
Member Local Offers (0)
Visit the AARP state page for information about events, news and resources near you.
AARP Members get $2 off Audible’s monthly membership
Activities, healthy recipes, articles, games and more
Members save 15% all day, every day at participating locations.
AARP members receive exclusive member benefits & affect social change.
You are leaving AARP.org and going to the website of our trusted provider. The provider’s terms, conditions and policies apply. Please return to AARP.org to learn more about other benefits.
Your email address is now confirmed.
Manage your email preferences and tell us which topics interest you so that we can prioritize the information you receive.
Explore all that AARP has to offer.
In the next 24 hours, you will receive an email to confirm your subscription to receive emails
related to AARP volunteering. Once you confirm that subscription, you will regularly
receive communications related to AARP volunteering. In the meantime, please feel free
to search for ways to make a difference in your community at