Skip to content

Docket: Recent Case Activity (Filed / Decided)

Case Name: Jammal v. Am. Family Ins. 

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 6th Cir.     Docket: 17-4215

Filed: 3/16/2018

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Was the district court correct in finding that American Family treated its insurance agents as employees?

Case Name: U.S. Chamber of Commerce v. U.S. Dep't of Labor

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 5th Cir. Docket: 17-10238

Decided: 3/15/2018

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF) and Decision (PDF)

Case Result: The fifth circuit vacated the Department of Labor's Fiduciary Rule that protects consumers from conflicts of interest when saving for their retirement. 


Case Name: Market Synergy Group v. DOL

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 10th Cir. Docket: 17-3038

Decided: 3/13/2018

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF) and Opinion (PDF)

Case Result: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit upheld the Department of Labor's "Fiduciary Rule" which regulates the financial advice given to retirement savers. The court held that the Department of Labor gave sufficient notice of the proposed rule change and acted reasonably in treating fixed indexed annuities differently from other fixed annuities.

Case Name: FTC v. Quincy Bioscience Holding Co.

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 2d Cir.   Docket: 617-3745

Filed: 3/7/2018

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Did the trial court err in dismissing the complaint filed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the N.Y. Attorney General to prevent Quincy Bioscience Holding Co., from continuing to make allegedly false and misleading claims that a dietary supplement called Prevagen is clinically proven to improve memory, despite Quincy's own research showing that Prevagen is not effective?

Case Name: GlaxoSmithKline v. Dolin

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 7th Cir.   Docket: 17-3030

Filed: 2/28/2018

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue:  Can a brand name drug manufacturer be held accountable for injuries caused by a consumer ingesting a generic drug when the brand name drug manufacturer failed to warn about known drug risks and has the sole power to do so?

Case Name: China Agritech v. Resh

Court:  U.S. Supreme Court Docket:  17-432

Filed: 2/28/2018

Read Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: After a class action is no longer pending, can absent class members whose statue of limitations have tolled file subsequent class actions to pursue their claims?

Case Name: v. Becerra

Court: U.S. Dist Ct. ND Cal.    Docket: 16-cv-06535-VC

Decided: 2/20/2018

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF) and Decision (PDF)

Case Result: The court held that entertainment employment service providers can post workers' age information on the internet without the workers' consent.  

Case Name: PHH v. CFPB

Court: U.S. Ct. App. D.C. Cir. Docket: 15-1177 (en banc)

Decided: 1/31/2018

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF) and Decision (PDF)

Case Result: The structure of the CFPB, with a single director appointed to a five year term, who can be removed by the President only for cause, is not unconstitutional. 

Case Name: Munro v. Univ. of S. Cal.

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 9th Cir.     Docket: 17-55550

Filed: 01/04/2018

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Can an arbitration agreement signed only by University of Southern California (but not the plan) and the participant force the retirement plan participants to arbitrate, rather than litigate in court, their claims of fiduciary breach against the plan?

Case Name: AARP v. EEOC

Court: U.S. Dist. Ct. D.C.   Docket: 16-2113

Decided: 12/20/2017

Read Opinion (PDF)

Case Result: AARP successfully convinced the D.C. District Court to vacate the EEOC’s 2016 wellness rules. The court made the rules ineffective as of January 1, 2019—two years sooner than the agency proposed to take to issue new rules. This is a major victory for AARP and workers because it means two fewer years of coercive penalties imposed on employees who exercise their civil right to keep private information private in the workplace.

Case Name: Cruse v. Henderson County Bd. of Educ.

Court: Supreme Ct. of Kentucky    Docket: 2015-SC-000506

Decided: 12/19/2017

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: The court ruled that Kentucky Workers' Compensation statute cutting off benefits at retirement eligibility age was unconstitutional.  The court ruled that Kentucky Workers' Compensation statute cutting off benefits at retirement eligibility age was unconstitutional. 

Case Name: Aponte v. Olatoye

Court: N.Y. State Ct. App. Docket: APL-2016-00130 

Filed: 12/18/2017  

Read AARP Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: 1. Did the New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) violate the FHA and other civil rights laws by denying an 82 year old tenant with Alzheimer’s request to accommodate her disability by allowing her adult son to move in to her apartment permanently to care for her?

2. Was it arbitrary and capricious and an error of law for NYCHA to have denied the request for reasonable accommodation and substituted another accommodation without investigating those needs or engaging in an interactive process with the tenant?

Case Name: Ass'n for Accessible Medicines v. Frosh

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 4th Cir. Docket: 17-2166

Filed: 12/6/2017

Read Amicus Brief (PDF) and Article

Case Issue: 1) Did the district court correctly conclude that the State of Maryland may prohibit price gouging in the sale of essential medicines to consumers in Maryland, including in wholesale transactions upstream from consumer sales, without infringing on the Commerce Clause?

2)    Did the district court correctly conclude that the plaintiff failed to make a clear showing of likely success on the merits of its facial void-for-vagueness challenge to Maryland’s price gouging law, which adopts long-accepted common-law standards to prohibit an unconscionable increase in the price of an off-patent drug over its previously established benchmark price?

3) Did the district court properly exercise its discretion in declining to enjoin Maryland’s law prohibiting price gouging in the sale of certain essential medicines, based on its determination that the plaintiff failed to make a clear showing that any of the relevant factors supported a preliminary injunction?

Case Name: Brotherston v. Putnam Investments

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 1st Cir.     Docket: 17-1711

Filed: 11/20/2017

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Does complicance with the Investment Company Act of 1940 equate to compliance with ERISA's fiduciary duties?

Is a settlor's contributions to an ERISA plan a defense to claims for a trustee's breach of fiduciary duty?

Case Name:  Maryland (State of) v. Neiswanger Management Servs. 

Court: Ct. App. Maryland  Docket:  No. 28, Sept. 2017 Term

Filed: 11/3/2017

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Did the circuit court err in holding that, although the Patient's Bill of Rights authorizes a court to grant injunctive relief to remedy violations of the provisions relating to discharge, the statute excludes injunctive relief barring "company practices" that violate those provisions?

Case Name: Thrivent Financial for Lutherans v. Acosta

Court: U.S. Dist Ct. Minn Docket: 16-cv-03289-SRN-HB

Decided: 11/3/2017

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF) and Decision

Case Result: The U.S. Dist. Court of Minnesota enjoined the Labor Department from enforcing the fiduciary rule's anti-arbitration provision against Thrivent, after DOJ changed its position, claiming the rule was at odds with federal law.

Case Name: Boothby v. California Department of Health Care Serv.

Court: Superior Ct. State of Cal., County of Los Angeles   Docket: BC627948

AARP Joined Case: 11/3/2017

Read Complaint (PDF) and Press Release

Case Issue:  Can California cut Medicaid provider rates without seeking federal approval?

Case Name: Oil States Energy Serv. v. Greene's Energy Group

Court: U.S. Supreme Court   Docket: 16-712

Filed: 11/3/2017

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue:  Does inter partes review -- an adversarial process used by the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to analyze patents -- violate the Constitution by extinguishing private property rights through a non-Article III forum without a jury.

Case Name: Brown v. District of Columbia

Court: U.S. Ct. App. D.C. Cir.   Docket: 17-7152

Filed: 10/30/2017

Case Issue:  Was the court's finding that Plaintiffs failed to establish "systemic deficiencies" in the manner in which the District of Columbia enrolls nursing home residents into home and community-based services against the weight of the evidence?

Did the court commit legal error by holding that it cannot craft class-wide injunctive relief if class members who have suffered discrimination cannot all benefit from the relief provided due to individualized cirumstances (e.g., some have homes to which to return and others do not)?

Case Name: McNair v. Johnson & Johnson

Court: Supreme Court of West Virginia   Docket: 17-0519

Filed: 10/30/2017

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Does West Virginia law permit a claim of failure to warn and negligent misrepresentation against a branded drug manufacturer when the drug ingested was produced by a generic manufacturer?

Case Name: Waldbuesser (formerly Grabek) v. Northrop Grumman Corp.

Court: U.S. Dist. Ct. CD Cal.    Docket: 06-cv-06213-R CJC

Settled: 10/24/2017

Read Decision (PDF)

Case Result: A settlement of $16,750,000, 4 incentive awards of $25,000 each, expenses of $1,159,114, and attorneys' fees of $5,583,333. Does not include settlement of companion case Marshall v. Northrop Grumman for claims after May 11, 2009.

Case Name: Cottrell v. Alcon Labs

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 3d Cir.     Docket:  16-2015

Decided: 10/18/2017

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF) and Opinion (PDF)

Case Result: The third circuit reversed and remanded a district court grant of a Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of Plaintiff standing.

Case Name: McGraw v. Chancellor Senior Management, LTD

Court: Circuit Ct., Raleigh County, WV   Docket: 16-C-698

Filed: 10/16/2017

Read Complaint (PDF)

Case Issue: Are Chancellor's practices of marketing certain levels of services, assessing care needs at admission, and charging fees based on those needs; but then, failing to have sufficient staff to actually meet those needs unfair or deceptive acts or practices under West Virginia's consumer protection statute?

Case Name: Thole v. U.S. Bank

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 8th Cir.  Docket: 16-1928

Decided: 10/12/2017

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF) and Decision

Case Result: Relying on a 2002 decision, the court held ERISA does not allow a participant in a defined benefit plan to bring a lawsuit claiming liability and injunctive relief for alleged breaches of fiducairy duties when the plan is overfunded. 

Case Name: Amgen v. Sanofi

Court: U.S. Ct. App. Fed. Cir.  Docket: 17-1480

Decided: 10/5/2017

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF) and Decision

Case Result: The Federal Circuit vacated the district court's order enjoining the sale of a cholesterol reducing drug that had been prescribed to over 18,000 people. This reversal of the permanent injunction is the result AFL sought.

Case Name: Single v. Catholic Pioneer Church Homes

Court: Superior Ct., State of Cal., County of Sacramento    Docket: 2017-00220058

Filed: 10/4/2017

Read Complaint (PDF) and Press Release

Case Issue: Can a nursing facility refuse to readmit a resident who has exercised her administrative due process rights and won the right to readmission?

Case Name: Vaughan v. Anderson Reg'l Med. Ctr.

Court: U.S.Supreme Court    Docket: 16-1386

Decided: 10/2/2017

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: Petition for certiorari denied.

Case Name: California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform (CANHR) v. Smith

Court: Ct. App. State of Cal., First Appellate Div. Docket: A147987

Filed: 9/29/2017

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Can a  California nursing facility circumvent the informed consent rights of a resident who does not lack capacity to make her own decisions?

Case Name: Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute

Court: U.S. Supreme Court Docket: 16-890

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Filed:  9/22/2017

Case Issue: Does the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) permit the State of Ohio to trigger its "Supplemental Process" for purging registered voters, due to a supposition that they have moved, based on such voters' failure to vote in a single federal election?

Case Name: National Ass'n for Fixed Annuities v. DOL

Court: U.S. Ct. App. D.C. Cir. Docket: 16-5345

Filed: 9/22/2017

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Did the Department of Labor violate the Administrative Procedure Act in adopting the Conflict of Interest/Fiduciary Rule to reduce conflict of interests for participants in their retirement accounts, particularly with regard to fixed index annuities?

Case Name: Brown v. District of Columbia (formerly known as Thorpe v. District of Columbia)

Court: U.S. Dist. Ct. D.C.    Docket: 1:10-cv-02250-ESH

Decided: 9/18/2017

Read Opinion (PDF)

Case Result: Court ruled that the Plaintiffs did not prove systemic deficiencies that could be resolved with class-wide injunctive relief. 

Case Name: Levine v. Ventura Convalescent Hospital

Court: Superior Court of Ventura, CA    Docket: 56-2011-00406713

Closed: 9/15/2017

Read SummaryPress Release and Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement

Case Result: Case settled in 2014 with court ordered injunction, fees and costs awarded and court monitoring for three years--monitoring now complete. 

Case: Charter Advanced Services v. Lange

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 8th Cir.  Docket: 17-2290

Filed: 9/6/2017

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Are interconnected Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services "information services" that are exempt from traditional regulation of telecommunication carriers, and if so, does federal law preempt state regulation of services classified as information services?

Some of the content presented here is in Adobe PDF format. You will need the free Acrobat Reader to access these files.