The amendment would establish a formula based on increases in inflation and population growth to set limits on the growth of state revenues. If revenue growth exceeded the cap, excess revenues would be deposited into the state's "rainy day" fund.
Jack McRay, AARP Florida advocacy manager, said the proposed revenue cap would result in serious cuts in spending on vital state programs. Restricting revenue growth would hamper the state's ability to restore funds for programs and services cut because of the recession.
"It's not about good government; it's not about rightsizing government; it's about strangling government," McRay said. "It makes no more sense to put your car on cruise control and try to steer through the rush hour traffic on I-4 in Orlando than it does to put the state budget on an automatic formula."
Legislature can cut taxes
Amendment 3 is unnecessary, McRay said, because the legislature already has the power to reduce taxes whenever it wants. A Florida Senate staff analysis reported that taxes on intangibles, sales, beverages, corporations and pari-mutuel earnings have all been reduced since 1999.
Amendment 3 was a priority of outgoing Senate President Mike Haridopolos, R-Merritt Island, who got the legislature to put it on the ballot. Haridopolos said Smart Cap will assure Floridians that their taxes are limited and are being spent wisely on essential programs.
"The Smart Cap amendment will create budget certainty for our state," Haridopolos said.
"Citizens will be assured that their state budget will not grow faster than their ability to pay for it," he said. "Moreover, any additional funds the state has will go into a rainy day fund. Finally, if legislators feel they would like to spend more, it will require a super-majority vote of both houses of the legislature."