AARP Florida’s top leader said Florida’s 2011 legislative session offered a mixed bag of outcomes for older Floridians: Some bad decisions, some pleasant surprises, and a late-emerging worrisome risk for the “frailest of the frail” in Florida.
See Also: What Does the Future Hold For Medicare?
In the session’s final days, with no opportunity for public discussion, legislators voted to lower state standards for nursing care in Florida nursing homes. Lawmakers also cut nursing-home Medicaid reimbursement levels.
“AARP cannot supporting taking the ‘nursing’ out of nursing homes,” AARP Florida Interim State Director Jeff Johnson said. “This action could be the safety or even the lives of the frailest Floridians at risk. AARP will urge Florida’s families to report directly to their elected officials if these decisions harm the care of their loved ones, and we will inform our members if nursing homes do not provide the care that our elders have earned.”
However, Johnson noted that Florida consumers won a nearly $2-billion victory when lawmakers rejected a plan to let big electric-utility companies charge consumers in advance to build renewable-energy facilities.
“The session could have been worse,” Johnson added. “Both AARP and state lawmakers will need to hear from AARP members and other Floridians about how these laws actually work for Floridians.
Here is how AARP Florida sees some of the good, the bad and the too-soon-to-tell...
Renewable energy. AARP and other consumer advocates won a major victory when lawmakers did not adopt a bill to allow big electric-utilities companies to charge consumers in advance for the cost of constructing renewable-energy facilities, such as solar-energy, wind or other power-generating installations. The legislation (SB 2078, HB 7217) would have cost consumers $375 million a year or $1.875 billion over five years.
“AARP supports the development of renewable energy. But renewable energy should be as good for consumers as it is for the environment,” Johnson said. “We thank lawmakers, particularly Senate budget chairman J.D. Alexander, for raising serious questions about this legislation.”
Home- and community-based care. Despite Florida’s bleak budget, lawmakers recognized the intense demand for home- and community-based care by maintaining funding of most programs.
Nursing-home care. Lawmakers did not adopt legislation that would have “stacked the deck” against families suing nursing homes after a loved one died or was injured by poor care. Among other provisions, the legislation would have set a higher standard for families seeking to use state inspection reports to show poor care than for nursing homes seeking to use such reports to show adequate care.
Health-care transparency. Floridians could get a better idea of what health-care services actually cost under legislation that gives primary-care doctors incentives to post a price list of what an uninsured patient would pay. Urgent-care centers, where uninsured people often get care, are required to post prices. The concept is meant to help consumers get an idea of what services cost before they commit to care.
Title loans. AARP also was instrumental in stopping an auto title loan bill, which would have allowed loan companies to charge more than 200-percent interest.
Distracted driving. While lawmakers failed to adopt an outright ban on texting while driving, they did act to require driver safety courses to include warnings on the risks of using phones and other devices while driving. AARP’s online and in-person courses already include such information.