This forum post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Vesuvius. Show Details
This forum post is hidden because you have submitted an abuse report against it. Show Details
I answered a challenged by a liberal who lamely refuted that liberal posters do no have greater leeway to posts attacks on people with opposing views than do the people they attack. That liberal asked for six examples, and I can up with dozens and dozens before calling it quits (with many more dozens and dozens to have gone through), and had to post it in three parts on the Politics - Current Events forum tonight. A couple of the original posts already have been deleted by the forum because incriminating posts made by other forum moderatos were included, and they didn't like being called out. Those two original posts have now been reposted (but absent the annotated categories, such as "Racist or Race-baiting Posts, Threatening Posts, etc.), so we'll see how long they remain. If they are removed again it is blatant proof that the forum moderators are indeed biased and banning posts and posters who are not espousing liberal dogma, because the ONLY things in these two reposted posts are the exact words that were posted by the offending parties.
Check it out, as it may have bearing on what goes on in this forum too.
I found that liberals are very good about attacking posters instead of the message while turning around crying about being attack themselves. There won't be good give and take until all posters can talk about issues and not about the people involved. Just as mbaker pointed out, the Health Care Reform Bill isn't about needing reform or not but how to reform the Health Care except the liberals can't talk about the issues just attacking people as not wanting reform.