This forum post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore LookOverYonder. Show Details
This forum post is hidden because you have submitted an abuse report against it. Show Details
I don't prefer one more than the other. Each were/are GREAT rockers in their way. The Stones were/are grittier and well rooted in the blues tradition. Less so were the Beatles, yes, but they were definately in touch with, in step with, the youthful / teenage angst of their time as well....and their lyrics captured the spirit of youthful desires. The Beatles were more instrumentally and lyrically innovative as well. But I don't perceive them as "better" than the Rolling Stones. Just as ReTiReD51 suggested, I agree, I won't choose.....I love 'em both!!