This forum post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore edsilha. Show Details
This forum post is hidden because you have submitted an abuse report against it. Show Details
Once you accept the science, it's clear that such massive environmental change will create dislocation, destruction, chaos, and conflict.
This is the key to Algore (moron only out for himself) and the entire man-made global warming "hoax". "Once you accept the science...". Here is the problem with that - MOST SCIENTISTS DON'T ACCEPT THE "SCIENCE" THE WACKOS ARE USING to promote the man-made warming theory!
You want facts? Go here: http://www.climatechangefacts.info/ There is a ton of information available from that site. It also leads you to other sites/info. Arctic ice down 10%! Whoa...I'm scared!!! Did you know/hear that at the same time (now) the ice in the Antarctic is UP 11%!!!! Didn't hear about that much...did you?
About the other post saying that on 60 Minutes (now there's an unbiased show....LOL) firefighters are ALL saying that the reason the fires are worse is because of global warming. Hmmm, I wonder.... Could the fact that enough funding to thin/clear trees/brush wasn't supplied to the forrest service have anything to do with it? How about the fact that radical environmentalists keep throwing objections in the courts to stop the forrest service from doing the clearing?
The fire was started by an illegal marijuana farm. Hmmm....could they be selling the the "legal" marijuana sellers in California? Makes you wonder....
The left just can't see the forrest for the trees....now firefighters have lost their lives and many people their homes. For what? Because some wacko environmentalists don't want the forrests thinned or cleared of brush?
Just a shame...
YOU CAN'T FIX STUPID!!!
Created 10/15/2007 - 11:00pm
All four of the leading Republican candidates stated that climate change is real, and it must be addressed.
Our party has come along way on this issue from ridiculing the notion of global warming, to finally considering solutions to the crisis but there is still a long way to go. And the urgency of this issue is only increasing, especially after this weeks release of a NOAA study that suggests Arctic habitat and climate conditions are changing significantly.
Sources of atmospheric carbon.
Table 2 lists the data for the four scenarios, but for projected year 2000 annual emissions of carbon (see Fig. 1). Scenarios A - C represent a rationally pessimistic to optimistic range. Although there is the mystery of the missing carbon, the climate-change skeptic's scenario D requires such a huge net natural source and sink that it would be impossible for scientists to have missed them.
Sources of greenhouse gases.
There are hundreds of climate change deniers compared to thousands upon thousands of scientists that believe it is a real problem that must be addressed.
So who should we believe, the few hundred deniers or the national and international science organizations of the world. You call Gore a moron. So in your opinion so are the members of the Nobel Prize Committee and the vast majority of Nobel laureates and prize winners.