This forum post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore alferdpacker. Show Details
This forum post is hidden because you have submitted an abuse report against it. Show Details
You got it backwards, I've worked with women who benefitted from these laws and the question should be about unequal work for equal pay.
Posted by kovalev6
You have a point there Kov. What's an employer to do after they've hired a Dunning-Kruger Teabagger, and the law says they have to pay the bagger the same as a normal productive employee?
Posted by alferdpacker
The condition above definitely manufests itself with those serving in this admin.
Here we see the typical liberal ploy...take a story with great merit and simply replace the name of the innocent with that of the guilty thus shifting the negative. We see this tactic on a daily basis on this forum. I say again this posting shows a lack of consideration for the feelings of the monkeys.
Posted by fangoh45
I do have consideration for the feelings of the monkeys.
But since conservatives have repeatedly demonstrated that they are ethically and morally bankrupt, I'd just as soon see a bounty on baggers and cons. It would create a bunch of jobs......