Join AARP
Join for Just $16 A Year
- Discounts on travel and everyday savings
- Subscription to AARP The Magazine
- Free membership for your spouse or partner
Message Boards Directory
Welcome to the AARP Discussion Board. Here you can talk with peers about current events ranging from Social Security to caring for your parents to the latest on health care reform. It is also the perfect place to exchange healthy eating recipes and job hunting tips.
These forums are for you to engage and have fun meeting new people. Just remember the community code: Be nice!
Supreme Court Decision on the Presidents Health Care Plan
False
Government & Elections
Supreme Court Decision on the Presidents Health Care Plan
<font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" size="1">Whether you're a red state Republican or a blue state Democrat, everyone is welcome — just remember to be civil.</font>
A victory for the President and even bigger one for the Middle Class, Poor, Disabled, and People with pre-existing medical conditions. A Republican judge sided with the President not because of
3
Cat:d51398b3-89f9-463d-bf1b-4b885f02c9eeForum:af978875-5bc6-4b07-a6fb-b18062132f95
Cat:d51398b3-89f9-463d-bf1b-4b885f02c9eeForum:af978875-5bc6-4b07-a6fb-b18062132f95Discussion:3d2edbe1-f4e1-4221-908f-a8e81291a381
Forums » Politics & Society » Government & Elections » Supreme Court Decision on the Presidents Health Care Plan
Forums
»
Politics & Society
»
Government & Elections
»
Supreme Court Decision on the Presidents Health Care Plan
|
Re: Supreme Court Decision on the Presidents Health Care Plan
posted at September 24, 2012 3:22 PM EDT
|
Posts: 86
First: July 5, 2012 Last: June 17, 2013 |
696. Two bombings to achieve the Patriot Act Bill (12/5/2011)
In 1990s twice I left US because I couldn’t endure the persecution from the Feds. At that time, the US was still a free country. I bought an air ticket. No one asked a word. There was no security search. It was like a domestic bus trip. That now becomes Alice in Wonderland. It was not the Feds wanted. They needed a power to search and detain without any reason. To achieve that goal, they activated two “terror attacks”.
The first attempt was OKC bombing. I allege so based on timing. I left US in July 1994 and returned in May 1995. The Feds must have felt the needs of a law to confine their dislikes to travel freely. To get me back to the US, they had dealt with the Chinese secret police. In April, my application to extend my stay in Shanghai was rejected. In same month, OKC bombing took place.
The evidence now proved the FBI conducted this bombing.
[quote] TERRY NICHOLS IMPLICATES FBI INFORMANT IN BOMBING
Amazing New Evidence Emerges in Oklahoma Bombing
By Pat Shannan ….. There are now serious allegations that the FBI, using an informer as a conduit, supplied McVeigh and Nichols with the blasting components the two used to construct explosive devices, one of which may have been employed in the tragic Oklahoma City bombing. http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/NICHOLS_IMPLICATES.htm [/quote]
[quote] Thursday, August 18, 2011
Oklahoma City Bombing: FBI Informants Reported on ABC News, McVeigh Defense Team
FBI informants reporting on the Oklahoma City bombing provided the bureau with leads taken from ABC News and Timothy McVeigh's defense team, according to documents filed in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit.
http://news.intelwire.com/2011/08/oklahoma-city-bombing-fbi-informants.html [/quote]
In early 2000s, I have learned from a news that said former FBI Chief Louis Freeh had proposed a bill similar to the Patriot Act after OKC bombing but failed to get it go through. I tried to have a google search for that article but failed. The Feds must have sheltered most information that related to their crime. They control information with their cyber team and NSA. Anyhow, I found another information little noticed by the public.
[quote] Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996
….. The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, (also known as AEDPA) is an act of Congress signed into law on April 24, 1996. ……following the Oklahoma City bombing, and signed into law by President Bill Clinton.[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiterrorism_and_Effective_Death_Penalty_Act_of_1996 [/quote]
Although the Feds failed to get The Patriot Act in 1996, that AEDPA revealed their intention. Be noticed that the title shows they used terrorism to expand their power five years earlier of 911.
Next time I left US in March 1999 and returned to the States in July 2000. One year later they bombed WTC. This time they got what they wanted – the Patriot Act.
The Patriot Act gives the Feds expanded (unreasonable) power of search and arrest. It seems they do not satisfy with this. Now they want to have the power to detain the citizens without trial for life.
[quote] Petition to IMPEACH ALL Senators who Voted for "U.S. is a Battlefield" and to detain U.S. Citizens without trial
The New National Defense Authorization Act Is Ridiculously Scary David Seaman, Credit Card Outlaw | Nov. 30, 2011,
Fellow entrepreneurs, Americans, anyone who still cares about this country at all -- this is a must read: By the end of this week, the US government very likely will have the power to lock up US citizens for life at Guantanamo Bay or other military prisons -- without charge and without trial. This means that, in the near future, a controversial Twitter post, attending a peaceful protest, or publishing an anti-Congress critique or anti-TSA rant on Google+ could land you "indefinite detention" for life, in the wording of the bill. No access to a lawyer, no access to trial. [/quote]
With this Act, what’s the good for the Constitution? |
|
|
Re: Supreme Court Decision on the Presidents Health Care Plan
posted at October 7, 2012 6:36 PM EDT
|
|
Posts: 86
First: July 5, 2012 Last: June 17, 2013 |
697. TSA search, Canada and Mexico (12/11/2011)
In September 2009, I renewed my passport. In later September I ordered an air ticket to Hong Kong. That night, as usual, I watched the news of the Chinese tv channel KTSF26. I was astonished by a report – it showed how the Feds planting fake notes into innocent passenger’s pocket in airport security check. To propaganda an illegal action of the Feds in positive way was unusual. Obviously it was an intimidation on me – “we wouldn’t let you leave US”. After two bombings(OKC and 911), the Feds got that search power. I canceled the air ticket right away.
Several days later, on 10/4, my father passed away. I thought it was another intimidation - done by the Feds. However, my father’s death only prompted my decision of leaving. I took a Grey Hound bus to Vancouver on 10/7. I was denied to enter the Canada. No reason was given. I complained to law makers and A.G.. Most had no reply, one suggested to ask help from D.O.J. . Here is the article I wrote about this event two years ago.
Re: “611. Restricted in US (10/17/09)
Ten days ago, I was denied to enter the Canada in board check point. Since I have all the document and sufficient fund a tourist should have. I think the board officer was instructed by the misleading information from the US Federal agent. Here is my complain to Attorney General……”
It was sarcasm for a victim who suffered in a theft case to ask for help from the thief.
There are three ways for me to leave USA: 1. by air flights. It is now blocked with TSA searches and arrest. (which means a framed case by planting is possible.) 2. through Canada. It was proved being blocked by the collaboration of the Canada government. 3. Through Mexico. The tactic the Feds used is to make it a killing field so when a particularly planned murder happened, it would have been buried in mass slaughtering cases. Those drug killings, was actually a distract tactic.
After I return home from the Canada board, I started to understand the purpose of OKC bombing and 911 attack. It was for the “search and arrest” power. (for the Feds)
Then more and more killing cases in Mexico caught my eye. I thought the Feds were behind those killings. They were afraid I would leave US via Mexico. My thought was proved one year later when “Operation Fast and Furious” was revealed. It is conducted by the Feds. The purpose was not to track illegal drug trading but to cover up a possible murder by mass killings. The “Operation Fast and Furious” was created when the Feds found I intended to leave USA. Check the timing.
[quote] Heritage: The Fast and Furious Scandal Continues
• Posted by Arizona Tea Party on August 31, 2011 at 8:30am This is the story of Fast and Furious, and yesterday the latest chapter unfolded when two top officials associated with the operation were removed from their positions, while a third individual resigned.
The story begins in the fall of 2009,
http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ1PyirMFXybt2fMH5NZnyv2lhE4n0LCSy5kvOvECbecXYaSToNFg [/quote]
Since the “fall of 2009”, the media and discussion boards in Internet were full with topics of “TSA”, “pat down”, “see through screen” and bloody killings in Mexico. They had a purpose. If a passenger was arrested for carrying “fake money” or “drugs” or other illegal things, the public would believe “the TSA’s strict searches” and not doubt it’s a planting case. Or no one would have noticed a single murder in Mexico when there are so many beheading, mass slaughtering cases there. |
|
|
Re: Supreme Court Decision on the Presidents Health Care Plan
posted at December 17, 2012 5:02 PM EST
|
|
Posts: 86
First: July 5, 2012 Last: June 17, 2013 |
698. FBI and DEA are behind the “Fast and Furious” (12/19/2011)
1. FBI and DEA control the leaders of Mexican drug gang. Thus they actually control the drug activities of Mexico drug trading.
[quote] “Mexican Narco-Trafficker’s Revelation Exposes Drug War’s Duplicity Posted by Bill Conroy - April 25, 2011 at 9:08 pm Trail of Government Intrigue Leads Back to Cocaine Jet That Crashed in Mexico’s Yucatan A high-level player with one of the most notorious narco-trafficking organizations in Mexico, the Sinaloa “cartel,” claims that he has been working with the U.S. government for years, according to pleadings filed recently in federal court in Chicago.
“Gun-smuggling cartel figures possibly were paid FBI informants Probe reveals that the U.S. agency running the 'Fast and Furious' anti-gun-trafficking operation didn't know about the alleged FBI informants. Congressional investigators are looking into the matter.
Suspected members of the Zeta drug cartel are… (STRINGER/MEXICO, REUTERS) July 17, 2011|By Richard A. Serrano, Washington Bureau Congressional investigators probing the controversial "Fast and Furious" anti-gun-trafficking operation on the border with Mexico believe at least six Mexican drug cartel figures involved in gun smuggling also were paid FBI informants, officials said Saturday. The investigators have asked the FBI and the Drug Enforcement Administration for details about the alleged informants, as well as why agents at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, which ran the Fast and Furious operation, were not told about them
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jul/17/nation/la-na-cartel-guns-20110717 “
“ Drug cartel leaders are FBI informants, official says 7 Jul 2011 San Jose Mercury News By Richard A. Serrano Ill- fated ATF deal could have been avoided, panel hears WASHINGTON — The embattled head of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has told congressional investigators that some Mexican drug cartel figures targeted by his agency in a gun-trafficking investigation were paid informants for the FBI and Drug Enforcement Administration. “ [/quote]
2. BATF only carries out the order from Washington.
[quote] How the "Fast and Furious" program put thousands of weapons directly into the hands of Mexican drug gangs Here's how "Fast and Furious" worked: Under orders from Washington, ATF agents were specifically told to acquire these weapons using "straw" buyers in the USA, find new buyers in Mexican drug gangs, then sell the weapons and "lose track" of them. Although some agents raised concerns about the insanity, they were overruled by the higher-ups in Washington who wanted to pursue this policy for their own reasons. "It made no sense to us either, it was just what we were ordered to do, and every time we questioned that order there was punitive action," said Phoenix Special Agent John Dodson.
But what could be the reasons for Washington initiating such a program in the first place? Why would the Obama administration actively send 30,000 sniper rifles, assault weapons and firearms into Mexico even while claiming to follow an anti-gun stance back in the USA?
To answer that question, you need to understand P.R.S -- Problem, Reaction, Solution. It is the "playbook" that governments use to get what they want, which usually involves: 1) Disarming their populations, 2) Taking away all their rights and freedoms, and then 3) Ruling over their people as tyrants with complete power.
Precisely such an effort is now underway in the United States, led by the Obama administration which has repeatedly demonstrated itself to be an enemy of the U.S. Constitution and its Bill of Rights.
http://www.naturalnews.com/032934_ATF_illegal_firearms.html [/quote]
3. Fast and Furious was not used to track the route of illegal weapons but was to cause a bloody killing field (or in National Defense Authorization Act: battle field).
To track one weapon takes a team’s work. How many people does it need to track 3,000? So the Operation from the beginning was not to track the illegal route of the gun trading but to push up a killing wave in Mexico. BATF agent also was ordered “lose track” of these weapons. The purpose is to make Mexico a killing field to stop a witness of the Feds’ crime from leaving US. |
|
|
Re: Supreme Court Decision on the Presidents Health Care Plan
posted at December 31, 2012 9:35 PM EST
|
|
Posts: 86
First: July 5, 2012 Last: June 17, 2013 |
699. B.A.T.F. is a scapegoat (12/26/2011)
B.A.T.F. was originally part of Treasure Department. For more than a decade FBI tried to take it over. B.A.T.F. resisted such effort. However, FBI has more influence over the law makers. B.A.T.F. finally is taken over by the D.O.J..
[quote] Merger fails to curb FBI, ATF antagonism Sunday, May 11, 2008
WASHINGTON — In the five years since the FBI and ATF were merged under the Justice Department to coordinate the fight against terrorism, the rival law enforcement agencies have fought each other for control, wasting time and money and causing duplication of effort, according to law enforcement sources and internal documents.
Their new boss, the attorney general, ordered them to merge their national bomb databases, but the FBI has refused. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has long trained bomb-sniffing dogs; the FBI started a competing program.
At crime scenes, FBI and ATF agents have threatened to arrest one another and battled over jurisdiction and key evidence. The ATF inadvertently bought counterfeit cigarettes from the FBI — the government selling to the government — because the agencies are running parallel investigations of tobacco smuggling between Virginia and other states. ……… http://www.tampabay.com/incoming/article499205.ece [/quote]
In Oct 7, 2009, Kat Sung – a target of the FBI and DEA because he witnesses their crime – tried to leave US via Canada but was rejected. It rattled the Feds. To prevent Sung to leave via Mexico, they decided to turn Mexico into a killing field in the name of drug gang war. (because they control the Mexico drug gangs.) Killing needs weapon. Then we saw “Operation Fast and Furious”. B.A.T.F. is under control of the Department of Justice. It was ordered to play the role to supply the weapons to the drug gangs.
[quote] Here's how "Fast and Furious" worked: Under orders from Washington, ATF agents were specifically told to acquire these weapons using "straw" buyers in the USA, find new buyers in Mexican drug gangs, then sell the weapons and "lose track" of them. Although some agents raised concerns about the insanity, they were overruled by the higher-ups in Washington who wanted to pursue this policy for their own reasons. "It made no sense to us either, it was just what we were ordered to do, and every time we questioned that order there was punitive action," said Phoenix Special Agent John Dodson. [/quote]
Though the B.A.T.F. agents question the operation, they were overruled by the higher-ups in Washington. As a result, since the fall of 2009, Mexico becomes a slaughtering field. More than 2,000 guns in operation were lost and many turned up in at least 170 violent crime scenes in Mexico. The Feds got what they wanted.
The “Operation of Fast and Furious” was revealed early this year. B.A.T.F. was questioned and some heads stepped down. The real masterminds remain untouched. B.A.T.F. becomes a scapegoat.
700. National Defense Authorization Act (1/2/2012)
The Gift of New Year 2012 President Obama gives Americans is a new law that ripped their civil right – NDAA. 1. It is a stealth raid on people.
The Act was proposed in later November, quickly passed by the Senate and the House during the Thanksgiving holiday and Christmas season. It was signed by President on New Year’s Day Eve. It was a typical military style - a stealth attack on civil rights taking the advantage when people were relaxing their vigilance in holiday season.
2. So said mainstream media kept a tight mouth on this important issue. Blind the eyes of a lot of people.
3. Majority of law makers and the President passed the Act. It proves the “politicians” don't represent the voice of the people. It also proves the election system has been hijacked by the intelligence already. The so said representatives are not elected by the voters but selected by the rulers of this country.
4. Beware the Feds to turn the US into a “battle field” so they could eliminate the dissenters. It’s easy for them to do so – just plant a few provocateurs in Occupy Wall Street Movement.
5. War on Iran is their major goal. With great possibility, there will be false flag nuclear attacks on US cities to justify the Iran war. Most people realize the truth of the 911 attack. This law is created to deal with the people who won’t believe this government anymore when such “terror attack” happens again. |
|
|
Re: Supreme Court Decision on the Presidents Health Care Plan
posted at January 17, 2013 8:48 PM EST
|
|
Posts: 86
First: July 5, 2012 Last: June 17, 2013 |
701. The most lethal sniper (1/8/2012)
On 1/2, I went to a shopping center in Milpitas. On a pedestrian bridge over Highway 680, I encountered with a couple whom were taking picture on a boy. The Feds has moved residents away from my area long time ago. The route from my home to the shopping center is like a depopulated zone. It’s unusual to see a family there. My thought then was: the new surveillance team wanted to take a photo on me?
On 1/4, there was a news in “World Journal”. “The Most Lethal Sniper in U.S. Military History
Posted by Bethany (Diary)
Friday, January 6th
With two hundred fifty five confirmed kills, Chris Kyle is the most deadly sniper in U.S. military history. Chris Kyle left the service in 2009 to “save his marriage.” He has two children and lives in Dallas, Texas. Since leaving the Navy, Kyle has begun his own military contracting firm, Craft International.
You can expect what kind of deal a sniper can contract with.
It reminds me the experience in Thailand. Here is what I wrote in “126. Sniper case (crime style) (2003)
When I was in hesitation, there was an article in newspaper said that US law enforcement agent had an expert sniper newly arrived in Thailand. He would be positioned at North Thailand to shoot drug smugglers. The article introduced the sniper's glorious past, that how many people he had killed in the war.”
The news forced me to change the original plan in case the Feds to murder me in the name of killing drug smuggler. In US the shooting murder used to be under the cover of random shooting death in “bank robbery”. I encountered one, (see “402. Bank robbery in San Francisco (1) (4/25/06)” #404, 561,562.) There was also another attempt in 2008. (see “559. Plan to murder in the name of "Bank robbery" (7/19/08)”)
I think this is the result of my recent revelation of the crime Feds committed. I also have been attacked by the censorship in Internet communication.
702. Internet censorship (1/14/2012)
The surveillance team of the Feds has various way to harass my communication in Internet.
1. The team created special formula on me which orders me to delete the links whenever I made url reference. In forum of “San Jose Mercury News” and “Contra Coast Times”, my posting effort often ended with the “instruction”:
[quote]“Your comment contains one or more links. To prevent spam, this forum no longer allows links in posts. Please press the back button, remove the links and resubmit your comment.” [/quote]
It seems to be a rule that applies to everyone. I have to follow the instruction each time to delete the url links. That creates a lot of trouble for me. Other members complained later:
[quote] “Katsung I agree with your conclusions for the most part based on your observations, but the evidence part of your thesis is lacking sorely in the presentation i.e. we need links.”
“We all find ways to post url's -- why can't you?”
Other people don’t have such problem. Until then I found that rule has been particularly set up for me. Since the format of the forum of Mercury News and Contra Coast Times are same, and the instruction appeared right away after I submit the post, that instruction must have been designed by the surveillance team and added to these two web sites or on the special server that monitoring on me.
2. My e-mail were intercepted or blocked. I failed to apply to be member of many web sites. My applications used to get no reply. Or sometimes after a “thank you” e-mail, there was no further “confirmation” e-mail. 3. [quote]“Your account is currently inactive, the administrator of the board will need to activate it before you can log in. You will receive another email when this has occured. Thank you for registering.” [/quote]
That used to be the only email I received. I think the application email or return email either was intercepted or blocked that I could not confirm the registration. Or simply the return email was a fake one done by the surveillance team. Following webs are of no reply or no further information that I failed register.
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/index.php https://secure.gn.apc.org/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/index.php http://community.compuserve.com http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/
4. Some webs banned me in rogue’s way. I think the Feds had infiltrated to the administration or forced them to do so. Here are part of them:
[quote] “You have been banned for the following reason: No reason was specified.
Date the ban will be lifted: Never http://forums.fanhost.com/index.php”
“Your account has been banned or locked. This is a permanent ban. If the Administrator has specified a reason for this ban, you will find it below.
Paranoid lunatic. Waste of server space.
http://forums.cannabisculture.com/forums/ubbthreads.php “
“You have been banned for the following reason: Posting unwanted spam
Date the ban will be lifted: Never
http://www.englishforum.ch/international-affairs-politics/ ”
“You have been banned for the following reason: Not here, either.
Date the ban will be lifted: Never
http://www.marijuana.com/index.php “
“You have been banned for the following reason: Done with the consipiracy theories, you have done nothing to contribute to the stoner side of this site. good bye
Date the ban will be lifted: Never
http://www.stonerforums.com/lounge/newthread.php?do=postthread&f=3 “ [/quote]
That “No reason was specified.” And “Date the ban will be lifted: Never”. reminds me of the the National Defense Authorization Act. The Feds give themselves the power to detain American citizens in jail for life without legal access. I have suffered from that principle in Internet long time ago. Watch that identical “never” sentence, how many webs have been in the hands of the Feds already?
703. War on Iran in February (1) (1/21/2012)
In last December I learned that my brother and sisters would have a trip to India and Dubai between Feb. 2 to Feb 15, 2012. Since my relatives used to be arranged for a trip when the Feds has a new plan, that means there will be a new framed case in February and it always comes with big events as distraction- false flag terror attack, war, natural disaster or all of them.
A news proved my allegation. It will be Iran war this time.
[quote] Russian military experts say the U.S. is likely to war against Iran in early February Date:2012-01-17 http://www.9abc.net/index.php/archives/72360 [/quote]
Why does the Feds choose February as operation time? Because there was a president election in Taiwan on Jan 14. National Party competed with Democratic Progressive Party for that seat. National Party is pro-China while D.P.P. pushes for independence of Taiwan. Of course, Beijing wants to see the National Party to win the presidency of Taiwan.
On the other hand, China is a key component in war on Iran. China is a big customer of Iran. It shares 20% of exported oil of Iran. China opposed war on Iran for its own interest. So if US wants the Iran war, it must buy the agreement of China. The D.P.P. of Taiwan became the chip of the deal and was sacrificed in 1/14/2012 presidential election.
On 1/10, Treasury Secretary Geithner visited China to confirm the secret deal.
1/14, Payment confirmed [quote] Taiwan's China-friendly president wins re-election January 14, 2012 A.P. |
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/01/14/taiwans-china-friendly-president-wins-re-election [/quote]
1/15, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao started his trip to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, United A.E. (all are US allies) to pick up other payments from the secret deal.
[quote]China, Saudi Arabia and the New Oil Alliance - 16 January 2012 http://goldnews.bullionvault.com/china_oil_011620126 [/quote]
1/19, China confirms the deal to turn against Iran. [quote] China Begins to Turn Against Iran
January 19, 2012 2:26 PM During Premier Wen Jiabao’s visit to the Persian Gulf, he struck deals with a number of countries, including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, many of whom are worried by Iran’s nuclear ambitions. China, which has long been one of Iran’s only allies and a major customer for its oil exports, now seems to be turning its back on Tehran. From the Telegraph:
“China adamantly opposes Iran developing and possessing nuclear weapons,” [Wen] said.
China appears to have sent a message to Iran that it could not rely on Beijing’s unstinting support by reducing its imports of oil at a time when the US and Europe are promoting an embargo on the country.
The Washington Post reported that China trimmed its oil imports from Iran in January from a daily average of around 550,000 barrels to 285,000 barrels a day.
Chinese foreign policy experts said the statement demonstrated that Beijing would not allow its international position to end up beholden to Iran.
http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2012/01/china-begins-to-turn-against-iran/ [/quote] |
|
|
Re: Supreme Court Decision on the Presidents Health Care Plan
posted at January 31, 2013 9:27 PM EST
|
|
Posts: 86
First: July 5, 2012 Last: June 17, 2013 |
704. Iran war (2) (1/28/2011)
Be noticed that on 1/10, Treasury Secretary Geithner visited China. I allege it was to confirm the secret deal. Next day, there was such a news:
[quote] Harper to visit China, seeking higher oil sales By David Ljunggren | Reuters – Wed, Jan 11, 2012
OTTAWA (Reuters) - Prime Minister Stephen Harper plans to visit China next month as his government looks to open new markets for oil sands crude in the wake of Washington's decision to delay approval of a major pipeline from Alberta to Texas. After winning power in 2006, Harper's Conservatives initially took a cool line with China and cited what they described as Beijing's poor human rights record.
http://news.yahoo.com/harper-visit-china-seek-deeper-economic-ties-202731193.html [/quote]
For the war on Iran, puppet Canada government ignores Beijing's poor human rights, now has a warm line to satisfy China's great appetite on oil.
On Jan. 18, news reported that "Obama rejects oil pipeline from Canada, triggering loud controversy". Of course, it is not for the consideration of environment as he said. It is part of the secret deal for Iran war.
All these events: Geithner's China visit, Harper's plan to visit China for oil export to China, Obama's reject of the oil pipeline from Canada, Chinese Premier Wen's visit to Gulf and new deals with these oil countries, were done within ten days - from Jan.10 to Jan. 18. The technical details must have been prepared in advance. That plan should have started from last November.
My last clear warning for Iran war date was October. see "691. October 21 plot (11/1/2011)". It signals with Harold Camping's World End Day prediction and FBI's case of "Iran plans to assassinate Saudi ambassador in US soil".
Since November, they were preparing this big one - bribe China. Part of this plot is NDAA. It was proposed in late November. When Obama signed it into law on 12/31, I wrote on 1/2, "700. National Defense Authorization Act (1/2/2012)". On point 5, I said,
"5. War on Iran is their major goal. With great possibility, there will be false flag nuclear attacks on US cities to justify the Iran war. Most people realize the truth of the 911 attack. This law is created to deal with the people who won’t believe this government anymore when such “terror attack” happens again. "
I would say my observation was very accurate. One week later, we saw all these events relate to Iran war.
705. Plant to frame a case (2/3/2012)
Two months ago before Christmas, I received a thick envelope from “VFW”. There were eight pieces of X’mas card with envelopes. Donation letters from welfare society are common, sometimes with mail address sticker. This was the first time I received nice X’mas card as gift. I was surprised. What surprised me more was on next day, my wife asked me if I had any X’mas card. What a coincidence, I gave her the gift pack received the day before. I took the pack back right away after she told me it was a request from C-Lady. C-Lady wanted my wife sent her some X’mas card.
I alleged C-Lady is a Chinese secret agent planted to be my wife’s colleague for 16 years. (see “635. May 21 plot (5/12/2010)”, “639. FISA plot continues (6/27/2010)”.) I think it’s my revelation, C-Lady had to leave the US in 2011. She monitored my wife for more than 16 years. She also was planted as an excuse for the Feds to apply for FISA warrant. (here we saw how the Feds abuse the FISA law to put US citizens under surveillance with the help of Chinese secret police). Though C-Lady returned to China, the Feds still tried to set up a connection between her and my wife, even I, with X’mas card.
C.Y. and W.S.(or H.S.) are a couple work for the Feds and Chinese secret police, I allege. (See “ 668. Chinese secret police (5/5/2011)”) Last May, they borrowed my wife’s minivan for two weeks with the excuse of “have to pick up many relatives from Shanghai”. The minivan, I think, was used to carry “foreign agents” or possible “drugs” to enable the Feds to apply “surveillance warrant” on that vehicle. Since then, I refuse to talk to the couple. I hate those evil souls with smile face. They knew they were not welcomed, rare to appear at my home later.
Same trick repeats. Last week, my wife came home with another car. She said C.Y.’s brother went to her office, asked her help to change the car with the similar reason- “many relatives from Shanghai needs a bigger car”. The Feds have big plot again. The framed case always have big event to distract – used to be Iran war. In last May, there was Operation Geronimo – to justify the nuke terror attack as revenge of Bin Laden’s death. This time, they even don’t cover up their attempt – war on Iran.
I don’t drive. How do they connect me to a framed case? Three days ago, my daughter brought home a writing table. It was free from the Internet. My wife told me to help to install the table. It reminds me of the exercise bench event. Several years ago, my daughter got some free gifts – sports ware from someone. The efforts to make me touch these sports ware were so extraordinary that I realize it was a tactic to pollute me with drug powder to turn me into a drug suspect. So this time, I install the table after letting my daughter clean the table parts.
This is how the Feds to maintain their power. They make living on terrorists and drug case. If there is none, they create one. So we saw 911 attack and “Operation Fast and Furious” with which they got “Patriot Act”, “NDAA” and fat budget.
706. SOPA and PIPA, internet censorship (2/10/2012)
False flag attack is now a common tactic used by the Feds. 911 terror attack was a typical one. Accusing it was done by Islamic extremist; US had wars on Afghanistan and Iraq. In Internet, they do same thing. When the Feds want someone to be banned from a web site, they launch a cyber attack from the same ISP of the victim until that ISP was banned, to reach the goal that the target to be banned from that web site.
I had experience. Once in a successful complaint, the web host told me it was because of the harassing of other user, he had to ban the ISP which contained my address. Since my neighborhoods are mostly agents of the Feds, I knew this is one of harassing tactics. Here is a recent one:
[quote] We sometimes have to ban entire ISPs because of attacks on this website... If you have been inadvertently caught up in one of these bans please accept our apologies. …….. http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1753004/pg3#lastpost SORRY - YOUR IP ADDRESS 108.200.54.202 HAS BEEN BANNED FROM VIEWING THIS WEBSITE ……… You may upgrade your account now to get immunity from bans and to continue to browse the site. Thank you for not stalking! WARNING: Obsessive Compulsive IP resetting with the intention of avoiding bans on this website and harass our users will result in your ISP being contacted and loss of your Internet service for abuse.[/quote]
This is a tactic to target at individual. When Internet becomes a place that public can get information censored by the mainstream media, how do they control? There is plan to target at the web sites with free speech. The last big operation was the case of “Wikileaks”. In that operation, Assange plays the same role of Bin Laden. Bin Laden went to the target countries to give US an excuse to start war at. Assange loaded the wikileaks information in websites the Feds intended to shut down. (in the name of spreading confidential information) The plan went soured along with the failure of Iran war attempt one year ago.
Iran war is the next big plot. So there is sub-operation to control the Internet. That is SOPA and PIPA. The tactic is to shut down the targeted web sites in the name of “internet piracy”. What the Feds have to do is just to let some snitches to load down some music from those targeted sites.
Media is controlled propaganda machine. Public can only get what government want them to know. It’s the Internet that people realize the truth of the 911 attack. So with coming Iran war, the Feds prepared SOPA and PIPA to eliminate the anti-war voice. They also prepared NDAA to deal with the anti-war people.
Some people doubt that why the Feds cost that much to persecute me. I would say because what I said are truth. The Feds are afraid of it. I have talked about Iran war attempt for years. Now everybody knows that war intention. I have different views on Wikileaks, SOPA, PIPA and NDAA because I watch from wider angle. |
|
|
Re: Supreme Court Decision on the Presidents Health Care Plan
posted at March 15, 2013 6:19 PM EDT
|
|
Posts: 86
First: July 5, 2012 Last: June 17, 2013 |
707. Operation Wide Receiver and Operation Fast and Furious (2/16/2012)
Before "Operation Fast and Furious", BATF had another similar operation. That was "Operation Wide Receiver" (also know as "Operation Gunrunner). Here are the two cases:
Operation Wide Receiver. Time: 2006 to 2007. Result: 462 guns lost track. nine people being arrested and charged with making false statements in acquisition of firearms and illicit transfer, shipment or delivery of firearms of which two have pled guilty.
Operation Fast and Furious: Nov. 2009 to the end of 2010. Result: More than 2,000 guns were lost and many turned up in at least 170 violent crime scenes in Mexico.
Operation Wide Receiver was proved a failed case. Why did the D.O.J. allow the B.A.T.F. to continue with another similar operation in even larger scale? Most important after all was that they deliberately let the B.A.T.F. to lose the track of the guns. In Operation Wide Receiver, Mexico government was informed and took over the surveillance on gun buyers once they crossed the border into Mexico while in Operation Fast and Furious, Mexico authority was left alone.
[quote] Fast & Furious, From A Law Enforcement Perspective By Barbee Kinnison– January 15, 2012
The main difference between Fast and Furious and Operation Wide Receiver is that under Fast & Furious the Mexican authorities were not informed nor asked to participate in interdicting of the 2,000 guns into Mexico (gun walking) where as in Operation Wide Receiver the Mexican authorities were briefed and participated (controlled delivery) of the 462 guns into Mexico.
According to ATF and DOJ, the stated purpose of the operation was to permit suspected straw purchasers to complete the gun purchase and allow the guns to transit into Mexico, in order to build a criminal case against the highest level of Mexican Criminal organizations, if so, then how does DOJ and ATF explain how they are going to accomplish this when they had no plans on working with Mexican authorities to conduct surveillance of the guns once they crossed the border into Mexico or the means to track the guns (no tracking devices install)? ...... Lastly, why would the former U.S. Attorney and former ATF SAC approve a gun walking operation when they both knew that the previous two ATF operations resulted in the loss of 462 guns into the hands of Mexican criminal groups?
http://www.newsnationbrewing.com/2012/01/fast-furious-from-a-law-enforcement-perspective/ [/quote]
"Operation Fast and Furious" became "Operation supply weapons to Mexico drug gangs" and "Operation turn Mexico into a battlefield". Law enforcement agents themselves were puzzled by this insanity case. They don’t know it was created to deal with Kat Sung, a target of the two powerful elements of D.O.J. – FBI and DEA. The purpose is to prevent him from leaving US.
In later September 2009, Sung ordered a flight ticket to Hong Kong. The Feds had a news in tv to warn that agent would plant fake money in passenger’s pocket to arrest in airport security search. Sung had to cancel the flight. He then tried to leave via Canada but was denied entry by the Canada authority on Oct. 7. Fast and Furious was initiated in November 2009, a further step to prevent him from leaving vie Mexico. (see #697, 698 and 699) This explains why the D.O.J. ordered the BATF to “lose track” on guns. They want to turn Mexico into a killing field.
708. Travel warning issued on Mexico (2/23/2012)
The weapons spread by “Operation Fast and Furious” caused a lot of violence in Mexico. Many of them were mass killings. Feds reached their goal- to turn Mexico into a killing field. But Mexico government protested when they found those weapons were from US. The operation went to its end when a US board agent was killed by those weapons.
The House investigates the case. BATF high ranking officers were reassigned. They became scapegoat. The real mastermind – the high ranking officials of D.O.J. , refuse to take responsibility. The Obama Administration has sealed court records. Mainstream media is silent on this case. They put it into a black box. This country is controlled by the D.O.J..
The goal is still there. Though “Fast and Furious” was exposed and failed, the operation continues. Follow the drum beating of Iran war, there is a warning issued this month. From it you may find the real purpose of the “Operation Fast and Furious”.
[quote] US increases travel warning to 14 Mexican states Associated Press – 2/10/2012
MEXICO CITY (AP) — The U.S. State Department is recommending that Americans avoid travel to all or parts of 14 of 31 Mexican states in the widest travel advisory issued since Mexico stepped up its drug war in 2006. ……
It is the first time the State Department listed advisories for each of Mexico's 31 states, including the federal district of Mexico City, where there is no warning.
http://news.yahoo.com/us-increases-travel-warning-14-mexican-states-180538719.html [/quote]
[quote] Mexican official: US travel warning 'ridiculous' Associated Press – 2/15/2012 MEXICO CITY (AP) — Mexico's top domestic security official says a U.S. State Department travel warning on almost half of Mexico's states is "ridiculous" and "out of proportion."
http://news.yahoo.com/mexican-official-us-travel-warning-ridiculous-044350173.html [/quote]
Mexico government doesn’t know it’s an intimidation from the Feds and a plan to justify a possible murder in massive killings and that the “Fast and Furious” targeted only at an individual.
709. Web site spy (2/29/2012)
In “702. Internet censorship (1/14/2012)” I talked about how the Feds harassed me with “no url is allowed”. While other members complained that why they were able to post url but me, there was a “RealAmerica” came out with a post: “I figger I'm already on the "A" list, so here's the URL - (cutNpaste:) thepetitionsite.com/892/petition-to-impeach-all-senators-who-voted-for-us-is-a-battlefield-and-to-detain-us-citizens-without/”.
He demonstrated several times how to post the url by deleting the head “http://www”.
I think he is an agent to cheat others that Kat Sung is not a target singled out by the Feds. He pretended that he is a victim too and hinted that there was “A” list existed in “Mercury News” and “ContraCoast” web sites. The agent used to think themselves as “Patriot” represent “America”. He uses a golden eagle head as his loggo chart.
Anyhow, I wrote #702 to reveal that harassment. Several days later, when I went to that web site, I was led to a sentence: “To prevent spam, this forum no longer allows links.” To cover up their persecution, the Feds made it a rule to contain all users of those two sites. Ban url links is rare in Internet. I foresee in near future the Feds will shut down those two web sites to cover up their crime.
I used to be banned from the webs with strange reason.(sometimes even without any reason). See #702. So I keep on registering to new forums. Where I was banned before I can even post a word. Here are recent samples. Is that a proof there is a black list that the forum hosts must verify the applicant to the FBI?
[quote] 2/18/2012 Thank you for registering, katsung47. Your account has been submitted for moderation by an administrator and will be activated shortly. You will be notified by email when this happens. To return to the forums, click here. http://www.theschwartzreport.com/vb/register.php?do=addmember [/quote] ----------------- [quote]2/21/ Thank you for registering. The admin must approve your registration before you may begin to use your account, you will receive an email shortly advising you of the admins decision. http://thechaniproject.com/forum/index.php?action=register2 [/quote]
Though I never receive any follow up email from these administrations, I at least knew they had received my application. Someone even had no chance to receive my application. I applied to join forum of USA Today. There was no responding email which as usual should be appeared in seconds in my mail box to confirm the registration. USA Today is mainstream media. Free speech should be their principle. They will not pre-censor an applicant. To prevent me from join a discussion board, the surveillance team blocked my email communication.
There was exception. That is http://mail.rebelnews.org/forum/index. I registered to that forum without any problem I had met in other registration. I didn’t post much on that forum because it’s not an active one. Most posts there were written one year ago. When every day I have to delete emails from that site I wonder why an inactive site is so active to my mail box. I studied that site - It’s mostly about Palestinians and is anti-Israel. I think it’s a bait site of the Feds. It may be a false flag site set up by the Feds or it is deliberately allowed being there as a bait site. The Palestinian resistance may have link to Islamic extremists. So it is used to entrap the people with “terror tendency”. FBI is notorious to set up terror case by luring vulnerable people into fake terror plots. It’s a tactic they used in Internet to net “terror tendency” people.
I have been allowed to post in Marijuana sites for a long time. Now I think it was out of same reason. The Feds want to link me to the drugs or terrorists. The DEA make living on drug case. The FBI make living on terror case. Without it they have no value to exist. So if there is none, they create one. In Internet, they work actively to violet the Free Speech Amendment but work hard to entrap drug case and terror case. In real life, you see “Fast and Furious” and coming “Iran war”. I believe they will organize a “nuke attack” in US to justify the war”.
710. Swift response (3/10/2012)
In "709. Web site spy (2/29/2012)", I suspected the "http://rebelnews.org/ was a bait site set up by the Feds to entrap "terror tendency" people because it was very active to send email to my mail box. Then I saw no more email from that web site after my posting. Several days later I went to that site and encountered with a notice: [quote] Dear Reader,
http://rebelnews.org/ [/quote]
I think my analysis is very accurate. It's a cover up re-action when a spy was revealed. Nobody would have done it except the surveillance organization who follow every bit of my posts. All was done in less than 24 hours. (I posted on 2/29, response was 3/1)
There was a similar case one year ago. On 12/7/2010 I posted "655. Bin Laden and Julian Assange, False flag and living plant (12/7/2010)" which I wrote on 12/6. Then I learned the news that Assange reported to British police.
[quote] WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrested by British police - report Tue, Dec 07 2010 15:16 CET byThe Sofia Echo staff WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was held by British police on December 7 2010 after Sweden issued a warrant for his arrest over rape allegations, London's Metropolitan Police said.
At that time nobody knew where Assange was. The Interpol issued a warrant on him. News said he was under protect of some liberal democracies in Europe such like Denmark, Sweden..... . I alleged that he was a false flag played a role of living plant. The Feds used him to track the people or organizations who sympasize with liberals and agree with free speech and helped Assange and wikileaks. But when a spy was revealed, he lost his function. Julian Assange ended his hide journey. The reaction of his master was very swift.
There were so many similar events. See "337. Swift response to #336 (8/27/05)", "531. Swift response from Feds (1/8/08)".
|
|
|
Re: Supreme Court Decision on the Presidents Health Care Plan
posted at March 29, 2013 6:30 PM EDT
|
|
Posts: 86
First: July 5, 2012 Last: June 17, 2013 |
711. Appliance trick (3/17/2012)
About 15 years ago, my wife told me a computer company on upstair of her tourist agency was shut down. The computer company had a garage sale on its asset. She bought a refrigerator. Since the "Operation Fire Dragon" just ended, (see 32. "Operation Fire Dragon") and Feds used to monitor the target as close as possible, I thought it was a surveillance team covered up in the name of "computer company". I kept a wary eye on that refrigerator from the Feds and refuse to use it. We had two refrigerators already in the kitchen. I put it in the garage.
Sometime later (a year or so), my wife told me B (my brother in law) wanted to buy that old refrigerator. Why B wanted a refrigerator he didn't need? I thought it was a method Feds taking back a high tech weapon through one of their informant. Before the refrigerator was sent to S.F. I took a test to see if it worked. I connected it to the power. It started with a low humming. I put a tray of water in the ice cabinet. Thirty minutes later I came back and found it stopped work. (no humming was heard) The water was cooler but not iced. It proved what I had worried: the refrigerator emitted EM wave, (in low sensitivity but would hurt health after sometime exposure in radiation). The surveillance team detected it with instrument. It was remote controlled so they switched off the power.
The refrigerator was moved to S.F.. B put it in the porch - he didn't need it. That night someone broke off the low compartment of the refrigerator and took off something inside it. Several days later I went to visit my parants there and saw it with a black openning in the bottom.
A few weeks ago, my wife complained the refrigerator was not cool enough. I thought, same trick came again? It was.
In later February, my wife discarded some appliance such like oven, warming pot. She bought a new oven in bargain price. Lady R.G. (I think R.G. is a guider works for the Feds) told her a site where Cosco have its flawed merchandise sold in low price. Several days later she bought a slow cooker.
In the morning of 3/5, my wife put the chicken in that cooker and switched it on then left home the whole day. My daughter left home the whole day too. I work on computer until I felt sick in the evening. I thought the problem came from that slow cooker and pulled off its plug. Later I told my wife that cooker may be an instrument that emits EM wave. I wouldn't let same thing happen again.
712. Water poison and dry rain season (3/26/2012)
I talked about the poisoned water in "187. Drinking water (12/11/03)" and "216. Poison tap water (3/29/04)". To avoid the poisoned water, I abandon the running water and the water from "water store". I have to buy bottled water from super market (sometimes I found it was poisoned too) and collect water from different sources such like "Water and Pump" in oil station, rest room in big store. At first I was curious how could the Feds poison the running water without pulloting the water system. Then I came across with such an operation.
It was a time when the Feds aggressively carried out their tactic of "poison the water" . I had to seek new source of water. I went to a rest room of a super market. Next time, when I went to that super market with empty milk bottle, I noticed there was a rubber pipe connected to the water pipe. Each focet is connected with two water pipes. One is cold water and the other is hot water. All controlled by switches. They took off one switch, install a rubber pipe to the outlet. The rubber pipe extended to another room. It was a temprary work done in a hurry. It was the shortest distance from the switch outlet to the forcet while the controller could squeeze the poison into the water.
One of the poison the Feds like to use is radioactive material. Radiation causes cancer if drinked. Radiation also causes skin cancer when people bath with the contaminated water. I found the problem when my hand grew up with black moles. I turned on to rainwater. I stored rainwater in buckets for bathing.
This rain season is the driest one in San Jose area. I think the Feds manipulated weather with their high tech weapon. In shortage of the water I have to take bath as less as possible. I think it's a tactic the Feds uses to force me getting sick. They intensifies the poison a few months ago. I got a severe cough early this year. So I am very careful on food these days, especially on water. Then my wife and my daughter had severe cough recently. I suspect they drank the radioactive water. (one symptom of radiation poison is coughing) When rainwater is in shortage, I still have to use some running water to take bath. Feds polluted the water with radiation despite it would also hurt my wife and my daughter. (Even they both work for the Feds. )
[quote] A wet end to winter expected this week in Bay Area
By Mark Gomez mgomez@mercurynews.commarinij.com : 03/12/2012 So far this rainfall season, San Jose has received just 3.13 inches of rain, just 25 percent of normal for this time of year. In Oakland, 6.12 inches of rain has fallen since July 1, about 36 percent of normal.
http://www.marinij.com/westmarin/ci_20154728/wet-end-winter-expected-this-week-bay-area [/quote]
After four months unusual dry for this rain seasom, there was a storm system arriving in Bay Area in mid March. The strange thing was, San Jose still was the driest place this time. [quote] Storm doles out wildly uneven amounts of rain across Bay Area mercurynews.com 03/17/2012
Rainfall totals
Source: National Weather Service
San Jose received the least rain. Oakland and San Francisco did reasonably well. And the Santa Cruz Mountains absorbed a near-deluge. [/quote]
713. 4/14 plot and N.Korea's missile launch (4/1/2012)
The Feds used to frame a case in the name of their accomplice. In Waco Massacre, OKC bombing, and Operation Fast and Furious, B.A.T.F. has been used as a scapegoat though the master mind was FBI and DEA. They let others take the blame for an evil plot. Another accomplice the Feds used to use is IRS. That's why so many plots on me were organized in April. (Tax return ends in Mid April) So when my wife said she would have a trip to China, I know they had a new plot. I review my thread and found the Feds had planned similar case in consecutive five years. (from 2005 to 2009)
301. April plot (4/2/05) 398. April 18, the action date?(4/15/06) 477. Internet planting and April plot (4/8/07) 547. Plant "drug money" (5/17/08) (I was blocked to internet for more than a month) 597. Rocket launch and worm Conficker (4/5/09)
From 2007 to 2009, each year my wife had been assigned a trip in April. It always accompanied with big events such like epidemic flu, terror threats and attempted war. There is a big similarity between this April plot to the 2009 one. The Feds manipulated N. Korea to launch a ballistic missile to create war atmosphere which would justify the war on Iran.
Quote of #597: "The planed action date of this March and April plot will be around 4/4 to 4/8, when N. Korea will launch a ballistic missile which is coincidence with the return date of my wife from her China trip. It can develop into a big conflict if the US intercepts the launching North Korea rocket. All depends on the Feds' decision whether they will practice their plan or not in rocket launch. "
The leaving date of my wife's China trip is April/14/2012 which means big events will take place around that date.
North Korea will launch a ballistic missile at: 12-16 April.
[quote] North Korea missile launches raise tensions guardian.co.uk, Friday 30 March 2012
In an unusual show of transparency, Pyongyang has told the international maritime organisation that the rocket will be launched between 7am and noon from 12-16 April.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/mar/30/north-korea-missile-launches-tensions [/quote]
There is other coincidence that indictes there will be Iran war.
714. Planting to frame a case on 4/14 (4/9/2012)
On 3/16 (or 3/15), about 9 something, I heard a big noise outside. I opened the door, found it was pouring. I had never seen such a big rain. I hurried out to clear the bucket that store the rain water. Just then, a car drove in the lane and stopped at my house. I wondered who was coming in such a big rain. A person, ( I couldn't recognize even it was a man or woman, becuase it was so dark and the rain was so big) holding something came to my front door. He paused a few seconds, might have recognize he found wrong address, then went back to the car and left without a word. I watch the act in front yard while it was pouring. I immediately felt it was a directed action of the Feds. They like to take picture to show suspects met at darkness even in big rain as evidence. I had such experience. (see "49. Frame attemption (continue to "37. Manipulate Bank operation") and "54. Trap")
The odd thing was that the rain soon was stopped. The pouring seemed only dropped for that moment. The news later reported : "San Jose received the least rain." in that storm. That least rain must have poured on my community. see the chart at: "712. Water poison and dry rain season (3/26/2012)". I guess the Feds had a plane spread large quantity of chemical in my area at that moment.
Feds used to plant fake money or marked drug money to me through my relatives and banks. To avoid the planting, I abandon the cash. I purchase with debit card. (see "547. Plant "drug money" (5/17/08)" and " 572. How Feds plant (10/15/08)")
In recent weeks, for several times, my wife called my daughter in loud voice to go to Costco to cash the rebate check. Since I have no Costco member card and I don't drive, it seemed to be a remind that they would go Costco and they could pick me up in that drive. I didn't answer her call.
One week ago, (on 3/31) she called my daughter again. I wondered how could she keep the rebate check that long without cashing it. Anyhow, I needed to buy some food before her trip. (started on 4/14), so I joined their shopping drive.
One day later, in my internet mail box, there were 20 new mails . They were all from one web site - grasscity.com. It's a forum about Marijuana. The most unusual thing was, I delete the un-needed e-mail every day. Those e-mails were dated ten days ago, hidden in last page. No body could insert these except the surveillance team. What was the purpose? Apparantly they wanted to connect me to some drug case.
Then I thought of the unusual trip of Costco shopping. The Feds must have planted marked drug money in cash rebate to my wife. Though I didn't hold the money, the picture would show I was with my wife when she paid to cashier. Combined with the unusual rainy night occurance the Feds is framing a drug case on me on coming April 14. |
|
|
Re: Supreme Court Decision on the Presidents Health Care Plan
posted at April 11, 2013 7:52 PM EDT
|
|
Posts: 86
First: July 5, 2012 Last: June 17, 2013 |
715. War as a distraction in April 14 plot (4/14/2012)
The Feds used to create big events to distract the framed case as I always said. In this April 14 plot they prepared a war.
1. War crisis in Korea Peninsula. North Korea announced to launch a ballistical missile between 4/12 to 4/16. The core date is 4/14.
2. War on Iran.
[quote] World powers to hold talks with Iran on April 14: ·BRUSSELS | Sun Apr 8, 2012 http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/04/08/us-iran-nuclear-ashton-idUKBRE8370BD20120408 [/quote]
It's not a talk. It's an ultimatun. A war could have happened any time at US' will when April 14 talks started. Simply because Iran won't accept a "surrender" demand. Here is the rare report news:
[quote] US Gives Iran 'Last Chance' Warning
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article31029.htm [/quote] [quote] US Offers to 'Negotiate' if Iran Surrenders;
Thoughts on Negotiation Tactics; Obama Threatens War
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article31034.htm [/quote]
3. Eliminate any possible anti-war voice. Based on his religious stance, Pope will certainly against any new war. At this time, if the Iran war happens, his voice will be absent. Watch the time coincidence.
[quote] Could it Be? Another Resignation? “Pope Benedict to step down April 15 2012″ from Kauilapele's Blog
· Posted by Ram Arjuna on March 9, 2012 at 12:00pm ·
716. Rocket launching is a hoax (4/23/2012)
The North Korea rocket launching might be a hoax.
1. North Korea just had reached an agreement with US on February 29 to exchange the food aid with a promise of no nuclear test and rocket test. Why did it break up the promise within a month? The meida puzzled.
I gave the answer. The Feds had planned a drug case on April 14. They arranged a China trip for my wife. Her leaving date was April 14. The rocket launch date was announced between 4/12 - 4/16. To distract public attention from a local news, the Feds used to prepare big events. This time it was Iran war. The rocket launch of North Korea was used to create a war atmosphere. They also prepared big natural disaster.
2. I allege the plan of the Feds went soured after my revelation. On 4/1 and 4/9, I wrote two articles to predict there would have been a framed case on 4/14 which would accompanied with big distract events. See "713. 4/14 plot and N.Korea's missile launch (4/1/2012)" and "714. Planting to frame a case on 4/14 (4/9/2012)".
3. If the plot went soured, it was unnecessary to launch the rocket. The media said that the cost to launch that rocket was about 850 million. Of course, the order was from the Pentagon, it pays the cost. Though Pentagon has a fat budget - that almost equals to the total military expense of the rest world, to cancel the order would still save a lot of money. US now has deficit problem.
I think North Korea didn't launch that rocket on 4/12 as they announced. I think it was a hoax.
Reason: (1) When North Korea received this order, they made it a serious business. They invite an international press delegate to report the Launching, that was rare. All journalists thought North Korea wanted to show it off. They expected to see it in live. Instead of, the men were told of the news which they should have reported. That became a joke.
[quote]Journalists covering North Korea’s rocket launch were stymied By David Pierson Los Angeles Times Published: April 13, 2012
BEIJING — It seemed like a reasonable assumption to journalists: Score a rare invitation to North Korea this week, and in all likelihood, you’ll get to break the news when the cloistered state eventually launches its Unha-3 missile. But that’s not how it worked out for the dozens of foreign journalists still rubbing the sleep from their eyes in a Pyongyang hotel when the rocket’s launch and flameout took place before 8 a.m. Friday morning in North Korea. ...... On Thursday, North Korean officials had seemingly been preparing the hotel’s media center, a circular room with tiered seating and Internet access. Large screens were set up and speakers checked. Broadcast crews staked out positions for prime viewing. ...... Press invitations to North Korea are scarce,
Obviously it was not the original motivation to invite an international press delegate. North Korea had prepared at least a screen show for them. Something unusual happened on 4/12. My interpretation was the secret deal was changed at that time. There was no rocket launch could be shown to the press.
(2) A "launch" by stealth". Because they invited press to watch the launch. It was an open operation. People expected the possible launh date would be 4/14 as N. Korean government pre-announced it was from 4/12 - 4/16. why made it a stealth? My interpretation: When the Feds cancelled the order, they replaced it by a fake "launch". To avoid curious watch eyes from outsiders, they made a stealth. Nobody could prove there was such a "launch".
(3) Media said it was rare that Norht Korea quickly admitted the failure of this operation. They said it might be a style change of the new leader. I thought the new leader had no such a psychological burden because there was no such a "Launch" at all. He just admitted "failure" to the deal. [quote]Journalists kept in dark over North Korean launch April 13, 2012|By Tim Schwarz, CNN
"We were supposed to see images of this launch. We didn't see that. This is a considerable departure for Pyongyang, as it's the first time that they have admitted a satellite launch has failed. It claimed similar rocket launches in 2006 and 2009 were successes, despite assessments to the contrary from South Korea and the United States.
(4) This third time rocket launch was much worse than the privious two. It only flied a short distance (one hundred miles) in a minute then fell into Yellow Sea. A technique retrogress? Or rather, a make up to perfect a lie that no one could eye witness it.
717. Natural disaster (4/28/2012)
As I always said, the distract events include big natural disaster. In this April 14 plot, you saw: (watch the timing)
1. Earthquake in Mexico and Indonesia.
[quote] Major) Earthquakes list April 11, 2012 – Very strong earthquake in Mexico ! Last update: April 12, 2012
http://earthquake-report.com/2012/04/11/massive-earthquake-in-michoacan-mexico/ [/quote]
[quote] Mexico shaken by two earthquakes in 24 hours
12 April 2012 Last updated at 05:09 ET
An earlier quake caused buildings to shake as far away as Mexico City A 6.9-magnitude earthquake has struck off Mexico's Pacific coast, the second to hit the area in the last 24 hours. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-17688048 [/quote]
[quote] Poster of the Northern Sumatra, Indonesia Earthquakes of 11 April 2012 - Magnitude 8.6 and 8.2
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqarchives/poster/2012/20120411.php [/quote]
[quote] Strong earthquake hits western Indonesia, no tsunami threat 4/15/2012 By The Associated Press
BANDA ACEH, Indonesia - Officials say a strong earthquake measuring magnitude 6.2 has struck off the coast of western Indonesia but there is no danger of a tsunami.
http://news.yahoo.com/strong-earthquake-hits-western-indonesia-no-tsunami-threat-111611373.html [/quote]
2. Tornado in US.
[quote] Weekend tornado outbreak predicted for Midwest 4/13/2012 (Reuters) - Forecasters are warning of a possible major tornado outbreak in the Midwest this weekend, with Kansas and Oklahoma seen at particular risk as early as Saturday. (April 14) Atmospheric conditions will be similar to those that caused severe storms in parts of the Midwest and Southeast in early March that killed more than 50 people, said Steve Weiss, science support branch chief for the National Storm Prediction Center.
http://news.yahoo.com/weekend-tornado-outbreak-predicted-midwest-170514316.html [/quote]
[quote] At least five dead in Oklahoma as tornadoes pound U.S. Plains 4/15/2012 By Steve Olafson Reuters
http://news.yahoo.com/tornadoes-pound-u-plains-region-braces-more-031849634.html [/quote]
You saw the main earthquake took place on April 11, both in Indonesia and Mexico. I allege it was a cover up to a planned earthquake in US. If the framed drug case had gone through successfully, there would have been a very big earthquake in US. The media would say it belongs to an earthquake cycle. (see what happened in Mexico and Indonesia) The technique used to create earthquake is HAARP. It may take hours or a day to see the effect after the HAARP being activated.
The technique to create tornado may take longer time. A tornado needs warm and humid air mass. To move such an air mass to the destination may take a few days or longer. When people complain the chem trail in sky, they don't know that's a way the Feds used to alter the weather - to change the air pressure of the area to form an air passage so the needed air mass could move through. Though April 14 plot was cancelled on April 12, the climate situation had been created to a tornado one already. (see 4/13 news: "Atmospheric conditions will be similar to those that caused severe storms....") So we still saw the tornado in that week-end.
718. Framing case went on (5/7/2012)
The April 14 case was failed to go through, the Feds continues for the new one. I think they prepared for another case in the end of April - my wife came back from her China trip on April 29.
Though the order of missile launch for North Korea had been cancelled at last moment, a new order was given. This time it was a nuclear test.
[quote] North Korea issues unusually specific threat
By Dylan Stableford Mon, Apr 23, 2012 North Korea's military vowed a new and unusually specific threat to its neighbors, saying it would reduce South Korea "to ashes" in less than four minutes.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/envoy/north-korea-issues-unusually-specific-threat-152720861.html [/quote]
[quote] North Korea's nuclear test ready "soon"
By Benjamin Kang Lim | Reuters – 4/24/2012 BEIJING (Reuters) - North Korea has almost completed preparations for a third nuclear test, a senior source with close ties to Pyongyang and Beijing told Reuters, which will draw further international condemnation following a failed rocket launch if it goes ahead.
http://news.yahoo.com/north-koreas-nuclear-test-ready-soon-source-061435477.html [/quote]
This time they didn't give a specific date of the nuclear test. It gave them more flexibility. If the Feds couldn't perfect a new framed case on 4/29, they could use it on next one. |
|
|
Re: Supreme Court Decision on the Presidents Health Care Plan
posted at April 11, 2013 7:54 PM EDT
|
|
Posts: 86
First: July 5, 2012 Last: June 17, 2013 |
719. "fake money" or "drug money" (5/12/2012)
In 2008, I found the Feds intended to plant "drug money" or "fake money" on me through the hand of my relatives. I turned on to the bank. But later I found I was treated particularly when I paid the cashier in store or super market, I suspected that the money I withdrew from the bank were also "illegal" with a purpose of "planting". (see "547. Plant "drug money" (5/17/08)" and " 572. How Feds plant (10/15/08)".
In 2011, a news solved my puzzel that the bank is operated by the Feds. It's easy for them to plant "drug money" or "fake money" on me when I withdraw money from it.
[quote] How a big US bank laundered billions from Mexico's murderous drug gangs
As the violence spread, billions of dollars of cartel cash began to seep into the global financial system. But a special investigation by the Observer reveals how the increasingly frantic warnings of one London whistleblower were ignored • Ed Vulliamy • The Observer, Sunday 3 April 2011
During a 22-month investigation by agents from the US Drug Enforcement Administration, the Internal Revenue Service and others, it emerged that the cocaine smugglers had bought the plane with money they had laundered through one of the biggest banks in the United States: Wachovia, now part of the giant Wells Fargo.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/03/us-bank-mexico-drug-gangs?cat=world&type=article [/quote]
The original bank I opened account with was a small one - World Savings. It later was taken over by the Wachovia. I think it was arranged by the Feds. They like to put their victims under their control. The "22-month investigation" was a lie too. At least in later 2008 the money I withdrew from Wachovia was "marked drug money' or "fake money" because I got particular surveillance when I spent them. It was since that time I would not touch one hundred bill. If the notes from the bank you couldn't trust on, anyone else?
The Feds (DEA and FBI here) used to make money on drug business. That's why the drug trading becomes prosperous under "war on drugs". My experience was one evidence. Though Wachovia played big role in drug money laundering, it was never charged. Because the real operator is the Feds.
720. Fake money and brainwash (5/21/2012)
[quote] San Francisco News Elderly merchant guilty of passing counterfeit cash
http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local/san_francisco&id=8336295 [/quote]
Peter Cheng, an 81 years old (2011) merchant, was prosecuted for passing counterfeit bills several times in gold coin trading in later May, 2007. Peter Cheng said he was innocent. The lawyer defended for him said that if the bank teller couldn't tell the notes, if the bank detection machines couldn't tell the notes, how did you expect ordinary people to tell?
There was a great possibility it could be a plant case. It was the time when I found the Feds tried to plant illegal money on me. Which forced me to turn on to the money withdrawn from the bank. But even with the bank the Feds could plant, I found it later.
I allege so because the Feds has a criminal style. They create case to justify their action. 911 was a good sample. To justify the war in Mid-east, they activated 911 false flag attack. To expand their power, they invent "War on terror". To justify their action, they created terror cases.
Ted Gunderson Former FBI Chief - Most Terror Attacks Are Committed By Our CIA And FBI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZ2VpfUqRoo&feature=player_embedded
So to frame a fake money case on a Chinese ethnic victim, they created a similar case on other Chinese ethnic people. At that time, I saw several "fake money" reports in Chinese newspaper. I think Peter Cheng, was unfortunately fallen into their trap.
It's a mind control. To create a situation to enbelieve people what the Feds told you. So far they sucessfully to make most people believe it's the Islamic extremist behind "terror attacks". Or "brainwash" as Feds referred.
Eric Holder 1995 "We must Brainwash People To Be Against Guns" |
Forums » Politics & Society » Government & Elections » Supreme Court Decision on the Presidents Health Care Plan
