Join AARP
Join for Just $16 A Year
- Discounts on travel and everyday savings
- Subscription to AARP The Magazine
- Free membership for your spouse or partner
New! Boost your memory with AARP Brain Fitness. Try these fun exercises proven more effective than crosswords
Members can save up to 80% on gift certificates from more than 15,000 restaurants nationwide.
Members can get exclusive online access to hundreds of free printable grocery coupons from leading brands.
Welcome to the AARP Discussion Board. Here you can talk with peers about current events ranging from Social Security to caring for your parents to the latest on health care reform. It is also the perfect place to exchange healthy eating recipes and job hunting tips.
These forums are for you to engage and have fun meeting new people. Just remember the community code: Be nice!
|
looming fiscal cliff
posted at October 11, 2012 4:48 PM EDT
|
Posts: 938
First: December 1, 2011 Last: May 7, 2013 |
Neither Romney nor Obama would significantly change our policy and seems that many Americans are expecting collapse of the dollar (that fiscal cliff...)Since the "little people" usually pay the highest price it's actually good to get ready in a way---i don't mean anything crazy, just e.g. growing your food (it's healthy too!). The only candidate who talked about it was Ron Paul - as if it wasn't a problem. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QP0cdZG6w9k&feature=g-all-u |
|
Re: looming fiscal cliff
posted at October 11, 2012 5:04 PM EDT
|
Posts: 12532
First: February 29, 2008 Last: May 17, 2013 |
Democrats are taking a hard-line on both looming defense cuts and expiring Bush- era tax cuts. Democrats want to cut the military which will not decrease our military of being as big as 6 --10 other countries or whatever the number is now. Why, claim the Republican tax cuts pay for themsleves! If that's so, why are all the states going broke? As we all wade into these numerical battles over exactly how much of this tax cut goes to the very rich, the more fundamental question is whether it's a good idea — either economically, or in terms of social justice, to have the very rich get very much richer than they already are. I know If I were Boehner, Cantor, McConnell, Romney--Ryan the top republicans I wouldn't give into the democrats either with nothing else to hold-onto except NO TAXES for the RICH and DERGULATIONS that make the 1% happy. |
|
Re: looming fiscal cliff
posted at October 11, 2012 5:27 PM EDT
|
Posts: 531
First: August 9, 2011 Last: May 19, 2013 |
There are Repubicans lawmakers who know better than holding on to these tax cuts but Grover NOrquist the real power in the Republican party will have no part of it. That is exactly why Romney will be a bill signer president and will go along with whatever the real powers within the party conceive such as destroying Medicare and Social Security, keeping the tax cuts to the rich, eliminate welfare, suppress women's rights etc. Romney has flipped flopped so much already you know once he is President there is no way to stop the Republican agenda that is already cut in stone. Then maybe the American people will scream loud enough they will shake the halls of congress and the senate to change the mind set of these lawmakers who are career polticians and are in it for the money only. In Response to Re: looming fiscal cliff: Democrats are taking a hard-line on both looming defense cuts and expiring Bush- era tax cuts . Democrats want to cut the military which will not decrease our military of being as big as 6 --10 other countries or whatever the number is now. Why, claim the Republican tax cuts pay for themsleves! If that's so, why are all the states going broke? As we all wade into these numerical battles over exactly how much of this tax cut goes to the very rich, the more fundamental question is whether it's a good idea — either economically, or in terms of social justice, to have the very rich get very much richer than they already are. I know If I were Boehner, Cantor, McConnell , Romney--Ryan the top republicans I wouldn't give into the democrats either with nothing else to hold-onto except NO TAXES for the RICH and DERGULATIONS that make the 1% happy. Posted by JANMB |
|
Re: looming fiscal cliff
posted at October 12, 2012 5:18 PM EDT
|
|
Re: looming fiscal cliff
posted at October 12, 2012 5:49 PM EDT
|
Posts: 531
First: August 9, 2011 Last: May 19, 2013 |
That is very possible and I don't care who is President can stop this from happening and may be the only way to rid ourselves of these career politicians who feed off the people they supposed to represent. In Response to Re: looming fiscal cliff: i read more about our currency and i think i understand more.After the WW2 dollar was very strong and was declared world reserve currency under 2 conditions *it will not be overprinted *it will be backed up by gold (35 $/oz?) but the first one was soon broken, and when FrAnce wanted gold for her $$, NIXON decided to break second in 1972 So now the Federal Reserve, which is NOT federal but a private bank keeps printing money out of thin air. that fiscal cliff they are talking about on tv is when dollar collapses= loses value and will not be a world reserve currency (should we expect superinflation?). Posted by Astra2012 |
|
Re: looming fiscal cliff
posted at October 13, 2012 1:47 AM EDT
|
Posts: 3023
First: March 2, 2008 Last: May 19, 2013 |
In Response to Re: looming fiscal cliff: I'm not an economist nor do I understand all that's happened, but I do know that everything fell apart once Bush/Cheney took office in 2001. Under the Clinton years, we never experienced record unemployment, had no wars, and most of us still had a vision for the future. So many things remain unexplained, but Clinton left us with a surplus. Once Bush took office, he squandered the surplus by returning it to the American people by saying that it was their money. We got a check for $300 which we really didn't need. Then came 9-11, but that didn't sink the economy despite the terrible loss of lives and upheaval in the economy. We could have recovered, but Bush continued on to give us 2 more unfunded tax cuts that were really a plus for the wealthy. He then engaged us in 2 unfunded wars that have lasted for over a decade claiming almost 7,000 Americans and trillions of $$$ in deficits. At the same time, millions of jobs were lost as corporations went overseas for cheap labor which caused massive unemployment. With less people employed not paying taxes as well as the tax cuts, Bush decided that it was time to create a real estate bubble where most Americans could buy homes. The interest rates were low while the prices of homes soared with real estate taxes increasing. Many Americans should never had been able to buy homes, but there were a lot of manipulations of mortgages that allowed them to do so, The bankers made fantastic profits, but the real estate bubble quickly crashed when people couldn't afford their homes due to low income or to loss of good jobs. People who were in stable jobs faced unemployment as their jobs were sent overseas, so their homes were lost because they couldn't afford their mortgages. We know the result of all this when the market collapsed in 2008 leaving Americans losing their investment savings. This then resulted in a massive bailout for the financial institutions that had gambled our money away. Now, the Republicans are blaming others for the tax cuts and wars that were never accounted for until Obama took office. It's never mentioned about how much we've borrowed from other countries to fund all of this. How much is still being spent for our military to be in Iraq and Afghanistan? What's it costing taxpayers for military contractors who are making huge profts by being there? Instead, the Republicans are focusing on SS, Medicare and Medicaid when we don't really know how much money is being diverted in tax relief for the wealthy. Where are the jobs, how much are we spending on these wars and why are the Republicans focusing on conservative issues? |
|
Re: looming fiscal cliff
posted at October 14, 2012 7:29 AM EDT
|
|
Re: looming fiscal cliff
posted at October 14, 2012 7:45 AM EDT
|
Posts: 471
First: December 21, 2011 Last: May 20, 2013 |
I You are not representing the whole picture. According to you Bush was responsible for everything. Under Clinton the Community Redevelopment Act was passed. Banks would be forced to make (subprime) loans or lose their ability to expand into other states. These subprime loans would be backed by the government. This lead to the issuing of CMO's, which were basically bonds backed by bundles of loans, many of the subprime. This caused the real estate bubble, An unintended consequence of this legislation. Again proving that government meddling in things they know nothing about has adverse consequences. As far as the two wars go, Afghanistan was necessary since it was used as a base for Al Qaeda. Iraq was a mistake, based upon faulty intelligence. Response to Re: looming fiscal cliff: In Response to Re: looming fiscal cliff : I'm not an economist nor do I understand all that's happened, but I do know that everything fell apart once Bush/Cheney took office in 2001. Under the Clinton years, we never experienced record unemployment, had no wars, and most of us still had a vision for the future. So many things remain unexplained, but Clinton left us with a surplus. Once Bush took office, he squandered the surplus by returning it to the American people by saying that it was their money. We got a check for $300 which we really didn't need. Then came 9-11, but that didn't sink the economy despite the terrible loss of lives and upheaval in the economy. We could have recovered, but Bush continued on to give us 2 more unfunded tax cuts that were really a plus for the wealthy. He then engaged us in 2 unfunded wars that have lasted for over a decade claiming almost 7,000 Americans and trillions of $$$ in deficits. At the same time, millions of jobs were lost as corporations went overseas for cheap labor which caused massive unemployment. With less people employed not paying taxes as well as the tax cuts, Bush decided that it was time to create a real estate bubble where most Americans could buy homes. The interest rates were low while the prices of homes soared with real estate taxes increasing. Many Americans should never had been able to buy homes, but there were a lot of manipulations of mortgages that allowed them to do so, The bankers made fantastic profits, but the real estate bubble quickly crashed when people couldn't afford their homes due to low income or to loss of good jobs. People who were in stable jobs faced unemployment as their jobs were sent overseas, so their homes were lost because they couldn't afford their mortgages. We know the result of all this when the market collapsed in 2008 leaving Americans losing their investment savings. This then resulted in a massive bailout for the financial institutions that had gambled our money away. Now, the Republicans are blaming others for the tax cuts and wars that were never accounted for until Obama took office. It's never mentioned about how much we've borrowed from other countries to fund all of this. How much is still being spent for our military to be in Iraq and Afghanistan? What's it costing taxpayers for military contractors who are making huge profts by being there? Instead, the Republicans are focusing on SS, Medicare and Medicaid when we don't really know how much money is being diverted in tax relief for the wealthy. Where are the jobs, how much are we spending on these wars and why are the Republicans focusing on conservative issues? Posted by intersan |
|
Re: looming fiscal cliff
posted at October 14, 2012 8:28 PM EDT
|
|
Re: looming fiscal cliff
posted at October 15, 2012 7:30 AM EDT
|
Posts: 471
First: December 21, 2011 Last: May 20, 2013 |
Unfortunately, voters are satisfied with THEIR congressmen, but blame other congressmen for the problems. So the same people keep getting re-elected (a nonpartisan remark on my part). Response to Re: looming fiscal cliff: falling off the cliff might be just what we need to wake up--the problem is that poor people would suffer most. congress approval is at 7% now - can you believe that?! We have elected these people to represent us but they represent corporations i guess, not us. Meanwhile i plan on planting some fruit trees around here. Posted by Astra2012 |