Join AARP
Join for Just $16 A Year
- Discounts on travel and everyday savings
- Subscription to AARP The Magazine
- Free membership for your spouse or partner
Help those devastated by the Oklahoma tornadoes. Click here to donate today and AARP will match your gift
Members can save up to 80% on gift certificates from more than 15,000 restaurants nationwide.
Members can get exclusive online access to hundreds of free printable grocery coupons from leading brands.
Welcome to the AARP Discussion Board. Here you can talk with peers about current events ranging from Social Security to caring for your parents to the latest on health care reform. It is also the perfect place to exchange healthy eating recipes and job hunting tips.
These forums are for you to engage and have fun meeting new people. Just remember the community code: Be nice!
|
Lobbying Power of Union Financing
posted at August 17, 2012 1:18 PM EDT
|
Posts: 5
First: August 13, 2012 Last: August 17, 2012 |
The Wall Street Journal recently published an article analyzing the actual amount of spending through nontraditional campaigning routes that unions have learned to capitalize on, typically leading to the majority support of the industry’s political interests. The effectiveness of how unions lobby voters and politicians has gone somewhat unnoticed in the past due to the difficulty in tracking their total political expenditures. The reason it has been so hard to accurately track the amount of spending by unions is because the inconsistent nature of reporting standards across departments. Under the Federal Election Committee (FEC) guidelines, unions are only required to report direct federal and campaign spending donations. But under Labor Department reporting guidelines, unions are required to report a much larger array of political spending, ultimately painting a much clearer picture (see below). Teacher unions also report campaign spending under a variety of department guidelines, sometimes misguiding users of the official statements. Top organizations include the American Federation of Teachers and the National Education Association, who spent $33.5 million and $45.89 million, respectively, in 2011 to further their political interests (see below). The Wall Street Journal notedthat, “The two unions typically give to advocacy groups that have been involved in various civil rights struggles and that they think will turn out at the polls”. These groups have quietly expanded their influence over the last decade through various political strategies, reifying the need for an unbiased overhaul of the current governing bodies. The Labor Department documents show the total amount spent on non-traditional political campaigning, like sponsoring union events, is the large majority of the group’s efforts. As the chart below shows, union spending on political campaigns jumps significantly a month before the election. By rallying the support of members into action, they are able to impose numerous policy changes at the local, state, and federal level. The time has come to improve of our current political campaign regulators in order to achieve a higher level of democracy in our current political system. Just as high net-worth individuals leverage power through donations, unions also leverage their power through members to impose political interests. Accurate records of the amounts spent, and donations received, towards political lobbying should be unbiased and reflect the true expenditures across all regulatory bodies. Taxpayers deserve access to a nonpartisan resource to track political influences. *Follow link for more on the current campaign financing model |
|
Re: Lobbying Power of Union Financing
posted at August 20, 2012 7:09 AM EDT
|
Posts: 473
First: December 21, 2011 Last: May 23, 2013 |
A very informative article!! I can tell you that the interests of union leaders is not the companies or entities that they work with, but rather their own self interest. NYC has charter schools which are taught by no-union professionals. They are mostly in low income neighborhoods. The students in thoise schools are at or above grade level. Unionized public schools are basically baby sitting services. Charter school teachers must either be effective or they're dropped, so they perform. Public school teachers are protected by their union. One Teachers union official was quoted as saying "they'll value students as much as teachers, when students pay union dues" Response to Lobbying Power of Union Financing: The Wall Street Journal recently published an article analyzing the actual amount of spending through nontraditional campaigning routes that unions have learned to capitalize on, typically leading to the majority support of the industry’s political interests. The effectiveness of how unions lobby voters and politicians has gone somewhat unnoticed in the past due to the difficulty in tracking their total political expenditures. The reason it has been so hard to accurately track the amount of spending by unions is because the inconsistent nature of reporting standards across departments. Under the Federal Election Committee (FEC) guidelines, unions are only required to report direct federal and campaign spending donations. But under Labor Department reporting guidelines, unions are required to report a much larger array of political spending, ultimately painting a much clearer picture (see below). Teacher unions also report campaign spending under a variety of department guidelines, sometimes misguiding users of the official statements. Top organizations include the American Federation of Teachers and the National Education Association , who spent $33.5 million and $45.89 million, respectively, in 2011 to further their political interests (see below). The Wall Street Journal noted that, “The two unions typically give to advocacy groups that have been involved in various civil rights struggles and that they think will turn out at the polls”. These groups have quietly expanded their influence over the last decade through various political strategies, reifying the need for an unbiased overhaul of the current governing bodies. The Labor Department documents show the total amount spent on non-traditional political campaigning, like sponsoring union events, is the large majority of the group’s efforts. As the chart below shows, union spending on political campaigns jumps significantly a month before the election. By rallying the support of members into action, they are able to impose numerous policy changes at the local, state, and federal level. The time has come to improve of our current political campaign regulators in order to achieve a higher level of democracy in our current political system. Just as high net-worth individuals leverage power through donations, unions also leverage their power through members to impose political interests. Accurate records of the amounts spent, and donations received, towards political lobbying should be unbiased and reflect the true expenditures across all regulatory bodies. Taxpayers deserve access to a nonpartisan resource to track political influences. *Follow link for more on the current campaign financing model Posted by acareaga |