Join AARP
Join for Just $16 A Year
- Discounts on travel and everyday savings
- Subscription to AARP The Magazine
- Free membership for your spouse or partner
New! Boost your memory with AARP Brain Fitness. Try these fun exercises proven more effective than crosswords
Members can save up to 80% on gift certificates from more than 15,000 restaurants nationwide.
Members can get exclusive online access to hundreds of free printable grocery coupons from leading brands.
Welcome to the AARP Discussion Board. Here you can talk with peers about current events ranging from Social Security to caring for your parents to the latest on health care reform. It is also the perfect place to exchange healthy eating recipes and job hunting tips.
These forums are for you to engage and have fun meeting new people. Just remember the community code: Be nice!
|
MedPac's Newest Recommendations to Congress on Medicare
posted at June 19, 2012 10:06 AM EDT
|
Posts: 1923
First: November 27, 2011 Last: May 18, 2013 |
Reuters June 15, 2012: U.S. agency urges new charge for Medicare patients Like it or not, change is coming and I think relatively fast and this is whether or not the ACA survives. This seems to be a balanced approach - beneficiaries having more skin in the game upfront but yet a cap on annual out of pocket. But what can we do for those whom the government is paying it all under the extra-help category or being a dual eligible? I still don't understand the difference in MEDPAC (been around a long time) and the IPAB (as established by the ACA). The main difference as I see it is that the IPAB setup has a bit more clout but how much more, I don't know. Seems these are the type recommendations both groups of government appointed recommenders would be making to control cost in Medicare and Medicaid. I also wonder if changes such as this come about, if more beneficiaries would go the MA route? What do you think? |