Join for Just $16 A Year
- Discounts on travel and everyday savings
- Subscription to AARP The Magazine
- Free membership for your spouse or partner
Welcome to the AARP Discussion Board. Here you can talk with peers about current events ranging from Social Security to caring for your parents to the latest on health care reform. It is also the perfect place to exchange healthy eating recipes and job hunting tips.
These forums are for you to engage and have fun meeting new people. Just remember the community code: Be nice!
MedPac's Newest Recommendations to Congress on Medicare
posted at June 19, 2012 10:06 AM EDT
First: November 27, 2011
Last: May 18, 2013
Reuters June 15, 2012: U.S. agency urges new charge for Medicare patients
Like it or not, change is coming and I think relatively fast and this is whether or not the ACA survives. This seems to be a balanced approach - beneficiaries having more skin in the game upfront but yet a cap on annual out of pocket.
But what can we do for those whom the government is paying it all under the extra-help category or being a dual eligible?
I still don't understand the difference in MEDPAC (been around a long time) and the IPAB (as established by the ACA). The main difference as I see it is that the IPAB setup has a bit more clout but how much more, I don't know.
Seems these are the type recommendations both groups of government appointed recommenders would be making to control cost in Medicare and Medicaid.
I also wonder if changes such as this come about, if more beneficiaries would go the MA route?
What do you think?