Contests and

Dream Vacation Sweepstakes

10 weeks. 10 amazing trips. Seize your chance to win!
See official rules. 

Driver Safety

Piggy bank on the road - AARP Driver Safety

Take the new AARP Smart Driver Course!


AARP Foundation Tax-Aide

You can get free, face-to-face tax assistance nationwide.

Money Matters Tip Sheets

Download and print out these PDFs to help with your financial matters.

AARP Books

Visit the Money Section

Enjoy titles on retirement, Social Security, and becoming debt-free.


Learn From the Experts

Sign up now for an upcoming Money webinar or find materials from a past session. 

Jobs You Might Like

most popular



On Your Side

A Different Kind of Housing Crisis

What to do when circumstances change and you can't buy or build that house

Sometimes companies do nothing illegal, nothing even out of the norm, and it still stinks.

See also: Protect yourself from telemarketing fraud.

In September 2003, Mark and Ana Triviski signed an agreement to have Topsider Homes of Clemmons, N.C., build them a prefabricated retirement home in Florida. The Triviskis paid Topsider a nonrefundable payment of $58,693. The total cost of the home would be $167,686. But even before the first board had been delivered, Mark Triviski, then 56, was diagnosed with cancer. On May 12, 2005, doctors removed four inches of Mark's esophagus and 13 lymph nodes.

With Mark's future medical expenses uncertain, the Triviskis were understandably hesitant to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars more to complete the project.

In 2008, the Triviskis reluctantly decided that their Florida retirement home would have to remain a dream. They informed Topsider and, citing Mark's health, requested a refund of at least part of the deposit. Topsider Homes pointed to the "nonrefundable" language in the agreement and refused their request.

One of my first questions to Topsider's attorney, Neale Johnson, was what the company had done with the Triviskis' deposit. Johnson told me that the company had spent the money on "preconstruction and design work" and there were "losses associated with materials they'd purchased." Per the contract, design costs wouldn't have been an appropriate expense. When I asked him to provide documentation of any material purchases, he refused.

In the end, the attorney fell back on the simple assertion that the agreement allowed Topsider to keep the money, so it would. His only suggested resolution was for the Triviskis to negotiate a new agreement to finish the house, requiring them to spend even more money.

Next: Three tips for getting a deposit back. >>

Topic Alerts

You can get weekly email alerts on the topics below. Just click “Follow.”

Manage Alerts


Please wait...

progress bar, please wait

Tell Us WhatYou Think

Please leave your comment below.

your money

Discounts & Benefits