Alert
Close

Last chance! Play brain games for a chance to win $25,000. Enter the Brain Health Sweepstakes

AARP Membership: Just $16 a Year

Highlights

Open

Grocery Coupon Center

Powered by Coupons.com. Access to grocery coupons

Bad consumer experience?

Submit a complaint to AARP's consumer advocate

Geek Squad

Exclusive offers for members

Technical Icon

Spanish Preferred?

Visit aarp.org/espanol

10 Steps to Retirement

Do something every day to help you achieve your goals

Contests and
Sweeps

You Could Win $25,000!

Enjoy fun, challenging games and learn about brain health. See official rules.

Health
Webinars

Learn From the Experts

Sign up now for an upcoming webinar or find materials from a past session.

learning
centers

Get smart strategies for managing health conditions.

 

Arthritis

Heart Disease

Diabetes

Most Popular
Articles

Viewed

Recommended

Commented

Web Exclusive
Chronically Upbeat

Word Power

Language has the power to define or wound: the fine line between often-silly political correctness and offensive stereotypical labels.

  • Text
  • Print
  • Comments
  • Recommend

When White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel last month characterized a plan by liberal activists to air attack ads opposing conservative Democrats as "retarded," he did not need the expletive that preceded the term to offend many. The word "retarded," when used in this way, is unacceptable. Not only does it hurt vulnerable people, but it cheapens us, and Emanuel may well spend a good part of his career apologizing for his callousness.

But let's be honest here. Who among us has not used the term "retard" among friends, in safe circles, never to be quoted or even attributed? We laugh it off, excusing each other's bad taste. The most sensitive among us wince and look the other way.

There's no denying the power of language to define or wound. Almost all of us occasionally use expressions that demean, based on race or gender or mental health.

What do we say then? "Mentally challenged" is a little too politically correct for my taste. "People whose faculties are compromised" seems weak, almost defenseless. Some of these people are defenseless already without us labeling them as such. Historically, they've been treated cruelly, even imprisoned, in parts of the United States. We want to believe that times have changed. But the battle is not over.

Unkind language keeps narrow-minded attitudes alive. Old labels feed old prejudices. In our society, one group or another always draws the short straw, and too often it's the sick, physically and psychologically, who bear the brunt of our linguistic cruelty.

Recently, I let slip with a "you're crazy," and was gently lectured by a friend who lives with bipolar disorder and is active in the mental health community.

"You are perpetuating stereotypes," he said firmly.

"But it was intended to be so benign," I protested. He just looked me in the eye in silence.

Even words that a generation or two ago were acceptable now reveal public prejudice in all its ugliness. New York City's respected Hospital for Special Surgery used to be called the Hospital for the Ruptured and Crippled. Georgia's first state psychiatric facility was the Georgia Lunatic Asylum. You could not make those up.

The name of the Newington Home for Crippled Children in Connecticut, which began its existence as the Newington Home for Incurables, was changed to Connecticut Children's Medical Center more than a generation ago. When I was growing up, "crippled" always seemed a neutral term to me. It seems harsh now. Maybe any word Charles Dickens used is automatically off limits. Tiny Tim needs a name change fast. Ask a guy on a cane about words. Walk a mile in his prescription shoes.

I am legally blind, a measure of how much of my eyesight has been lost to my MS. That is a legal distinction in virtually every state. Legally sightless? There are no degrees of sightlessness.

And then there are "handicapped" and "disabled." I know people who find the word handicapped judgmental. My mother thinks disabled means one cannot function at all. I am agnostic on this one. How about "differently-abled"? That's a popular term now, but it seems silly to me. I think handicaps should be reserved for golfers. Thoughout my 25-year battle with MS, I have spent a lot of time proving to myself that I can do. I am abled. So don't foist your terminology on me. You don't know me. Leave me out of your word box.

"Words are loaded pistols," Jean-Paul Sartre wrote. Rahm Emanuel—and the rest of us—would do well to remember that.

Richard M. Cohen is an Emmy-winning TV news producer and author. His column is published on AARP The Magazine Online every two weeks.

Topic Alerts

You can get weekly email alerts on the topics below. Just click “Follow.”

Manage Alerts

Processing

Please wait...

progress bar, please wait

Tell Us WhatYou Think

Please leave your comment below.

You must be signed in to comment.

Sign In | Register

More comments »

Health Blog

Discounts & Benefits

AARP Discounts on ACE Services

Members save 20% off on personal training and group fitness with American Council on Exercise.

Grandson (8-9) whispering to grandfather, close-up

Members save on hearing care with the AARP® Hearing Care Program provided by HearUSA.

Member Benefits

Members receive exclusive member benefits and affect social change. Join Today

bring health To Life-Visual MD

featured
Groups

Social Security

How to strengthen Social Security for future generations. Discuss

Medicare & Insurance

Share health coverage information and experiences common to being age 50+. Join

Health Nuts

Share heart-smart recipes, fitness tips and stress relievers. Join