AARP Member
Offline
Background
Name: George
Gender: Male
Status: Married
Ethnicity: Caucasian
Location:
NEW PHILADELPHIA, Ohio
United States
School:
Columbus Business University
Idaho State University (BBA)
University of Toledo (BS Technical Development Services)
Work:
Primarily as Nuclear Power Plant Operator and Trainer, with over a decade of management analysis and operational auditing. Developed and taught Tech Staff and MGR curriculum.
Quote:
There is dignity in any form of honest work, and no dignity in either begging or theft.

About Me

Semi-retired nuclear power plant expert and corporate operations advisor. Really poor childhood,with experience dairy farming, rootbeer standing, grocery clerking, copier repairing, and three kid raising. Very happily married to a computer expert who wanted to be a veterinarian. This is an effort to bring common sense and reason back into the US social and political structure. I am a UTILITARIAN politically, period - and TRY to be MODERATE about it! A "utilitarian" tries to find the solution that is the best overall for everyone involved, instead of what is best for a few.

Interests:
Getting functional authority returned to parents, teachers, and police. Refocusing public education to get the cost down and the living skills up. Restructuring the energy infrastructure to help get us out of the mideast and back into the financial black. Getting a moderate party established to force a return to common sense compromises that benefit society the most, not just special interest deals. I do not believe it is too late.

My Photos (0)

This user does not have any photos.

My Videos (0)

This user does not have any videos.

My Journals (11)

 

 

 

 

 

The USA needs lots of energy infrastructure quickly, but MOST of this new infrastructure should be owned by the public to avoid the mistakes of the past.  We need to imitate nearly all of our world competitors.  Nobody does it like the US, because our way doesn’t work!  Our way pits public needs/fears against the profit motive of private ownership. All we get is ugly legal battles and substandard results.  Enough already.

 

The US needs to sell tax free, reasonable yield, federal ENERGY BONDS to pay for the needed infrastructure.  These bonds should only be available to US citizens who pay taxes in the US, and financial institutions that are registered in the US - no foreign owners that can throw a wrench into our plans.  After the first 5 years, let the proceeds from sales and services start paying back the bondholders.  Energy Bonds will do for this mess what War Bonds did for us in World War II.

 

NEEDS:

New clean coal power plants NOW, as soon as we can build them.

 

Nuclear power generating plants, as soon as we can build them - new design Light Water Reactors (LWR’s) and (proven for 50 years now) Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactors  (LMFBR’s).  LMFBR’s are a RENEWABLE(+) energy source, like wind/solar.

 

LMFBR’s as soon as we can build them.  They produce 20% more fuel than they are using to produce electric power - the excess can go to LWR’s.  WE can supply ALL USA electric needs (and LWR’s) for over 1000 years with no new mining - proven fact. LMFBR’s have been reliably operating since 1951 in the US and France. (See EBR II and PHENIX, which have generated reliably for over 30 years).

 

Strengthen the bulk power electricity transmission grid that moves BIG power from region to region, to avoid the blackouts and brownouts that will soon be commonplace - and to move NEW big power from where it can be best produced to where it is most needed.

ALL of these new facilities should be built on land already owned by the federal government, so that NIMBY interference will be effectively blunted.  Perfect sites are closed military facilities and energy/weapons research sites.

More electric power is CRITICAL to converting oil usage to electric usage.  We absolutely have to get the OIL needle out of our arm, or we will forever be in trouble.

 

 FIX DETAILS:

The Department of Transportation manages our transportation infrastructure, which is owned by the US PUBLIC!  DOT did not steal any turnpikes from anyone.  They strengthened the limited access highway system with PUBLICLY owned interstates.  That helps keep tolls in line, and has made ALL the products we buy less expensive by reducing delivery expense.  Construction and repair of the highways is done by contractors under DOT, and a lot of money goes into private payrolls every year.  The same would be true of DOE managed facilities.

 

The Department of Energy (DOE) needs to manage the ENERGY infrastructure that will be publicly owned.  DOE management should be assisted by, but not blocked by, the US EPA to assure that responsible practices  are employed during drilling, construction, and operation of ALL US PUBLIC owned facilities.  With the public owning the facilities, and paying for the environmental protection, there will be no "conflict of interest."  If the public wants green, they’ll pay for it - if they don’t want to pay for it - then it stops!  The same rules should apply for public/private.

 

US DOE (assisted by US EPA) will have to manage the construction and operation of publicly owned oil drilling rigs, public refineries, public coal power plants, new public small scale hydroelectric stations, publicly owned large scale clean coal facilities, and newer/safer nuclear plants - both the Light Water Reactor and Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactors.

 

The OILGOPOLY wants to start drilling on their 68 million acres.  The US government should issue those permits, but only if the oil company accepts two contract rules:

 

 

First, the permit for the private well would only be issued AFTER the company had successfully bid for a public well and has that public well producing acceptably (within a one year limit from start of drilling).  If a second private well is desired, then a second public well must be bid and activated, and so on. This factor will keep private wells from coming on line while the public wells "just don’t."  Business is business - that’s why contracts are needed.

 

 

 

Second, the oil company must agree to allow both a resident DOE and EPA inspector unfettered access to all aspects of the public well, and must allow a resident EPA inspector at the private well, also.  The nuclear industry has lived under this arrangement for decades.  Also, the EPA rules for both the public and private facilities should be the same. 

 

 

This level of EPA involvement ought to satisfy reasonable environmental concerns. 

This "FIX" will give the public the beginning of the energy independence it needs, provide lots of good jobs quickly, make a bunch of money for the oil companies working for the DOE and themselves, satisfy the environmentalists, provide quality investments for US persons and entities, and the PUBLIC will own the tools of its own energy future - no more to be held hostage by other countries or companies. 

 

This fix will work, and everybody wins.  How good is that?

 

Please help get this done by showing it to your politicians.  This country’s energy and economic future is too important to play partisan political games.  Thanks for reading this long piece.

Added: June 22, 2008
Views: 36 | Comments: 0 | Bookmarks: 0
westsinger says:
I will be actively working for the re-election of Paul Broun in Georgia. He is a strong conservative but in his case the right answer is more important than support of a voting bloc. He is a medical doctor instead of a lawyer. I would like to see your energy plan in as concise a form as possible and I'll get it to him. I'm sure you are familiar with the Savannah River Site, which is just across the river from me. There has been a lot of money pumped into feasibility of a new reactor facility there and would receive massive support from the population in this area. The oil issue is tricky but it looks like the tide is turning enough to rally a majority from both parties to do something important. As bad as I hate it, it has taken $4 gas to get it there and I am leaving on a 2000+ mile road trip tomorrow. I am trying to research this angle a little more before I get too vocal about it. One side screams "obscene profits" while the other side says they make a smaller percentage of net profit than almost any other industry, which is true. BUT!!! I think it could be proven that the oil industry has been cleverly paying themselves enough and creating "expenses" so they would continue to NET in the single digits and I don't hear that part of the story coming out in Congressional hearings. How do you think the average salary in the oil industry compares to the industries that they compare their profit margtins to? We will shoot ourselves in the economic foot if we hurt them too bad but I would like to see the OC's backed into the ropes a little. I think our best hope is to rally voters behind a "new politics" banner, demanding results instead of painting black what the other side paints white. You probably call that "moderate". LOL I doubt if it will happen until the president has line item veto but like the gas issue, if it gets bad enough, people will vote! Don't know if I'll get around a computer while I am in Tulsa(the ex oil capital of the world) but I might
Posted: June 25, 2008 5:29AM EDT
westsinger says:
George...... Why is "moderate" descriptive or even accurate where you are concerned. I have preached what you describe for years. I lived in Holland for a time as a kid and this is how their education system is set up. My wife is an academic coach to middle schoolers that are not on track to graduate and we know you are on the right track but the political landscape IS going to have to change radically before it can be accomplished. My wife has done home visits where there's pit bulls chained to the porch just to find out why their child can't seem to get to school. He comes to school now and she has that family's respect. He may not become a nuclear power expert but he won't become the same statistic he was close to becoming. It's a great plan that you have outlined but please help me understand how we can get a current politician to run with it. Believe me, I am not a close minded radical but I don't see enough people in this country anymore with enough respect for elected officials at any level to follow them through the storm it would take to get this done. A common sense approach (your words) gets chewed up and spit out everyday of the week in Washington.
Give the president line item veto, mandate energy independence, stop this "living and breathing document" nonsense with the Supreme Court and make the illegals go back and apply for legal status with sponsorship of employers and our dollar will get back where it ought to be. I'm going to give it rest for today but I am interested in your thoughts
Posted: June 21, 2008 8:42PM EDT
geosummers says:
That's the problem with quick impressions. You are ALSO an intelligent and thoughtful individual. WE need a whole new breed of politician - like the founding fathers - who are willing to lay it on the line. All we have is our vote, and our ability to join a political movement that demands sensible results. I have been trying in vain to get anyone to join me in finding effective ground. Results have been mostly depressing
Posted: June 21, 2008 8:48PM EDT
Add your Comments: