You are now leaving the AARP.org web site. Please visit us again soon, or
use the Cancel button to remain on our site. AARP is not associated
with the site you are about to visit, and we are not responsible for its
content. If the site is unknown, or you are unsure of its content, you
can research it further with Stopbadware.org
or McAfee.com.
You are about to report a violation of our Terms of Use. All reports are strictly confidential. AARP.org will review this report and take action as necessary.
You are about to report a violation of our Terms of Use. All reports are strictly confidential. AARP.org will review this report and take action as necessary.
The basic costs of
living for older Vermonters far exceed the poverty levels set by the
federal government – levels often used to determine eligibility
for public assistance programs. A new study released by AARP
Vermont today details the costs for elders to meet the basic needs of
living here, and establishes an affordability baseline called the
Elder Economic Security Standard (EESS). Similar to the process
of setting a livable wage calculation for Vermont workers, this data
highlights the heavy economic burden on older residents (retired
residents over age 65), many of whom live on very modest fixed
incomes. It factors in the costs of housing, food, transportation,
health care, and a host of miscellaneous expenses such as furniture,
clothing, telephone and household supplies, etc.
The study is being released
today as attention focuses on Vermont’s affordability and
poverty problems at the 2009 Governor’s Summit on Pathways to
Economic Stability. The summit is taking place in the Vermont Statehouse.
“This standard provides
a baseline for policymakers, state agencies and government officials
as they look at programs that support this population,” said
Greg Marchildon, AARP state director. “The most glaring
finding here is the huge gap between the Vermont EESS and the federal
poverty level used to determine eligibility for a host of state and
federal assistance programs. The current poverty levels are
clearly outdated and do not reflect the reality of today’s cost
of living.”
For example, to meet their
basic needs, a couple over age 65 with a mortgage needs nearly triple
the $13,014 poverty level as established by the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services. A couple without a mortgage still needs
$28,505 a year to meet their basic needs – more than twice the
federal poverty level – according to the EESS research. The
EESS for an individual (without a mortgage) is $21,058 – the
highest of any state for which similar data is available.
Other
measures point out the large segments of the over 65 population living
at or below the edge of poverty. In recognition of this, eligibility
for many public assistance programs is set at multiples of the poverty
threshold (i.e., 150%, 200%, etc.). So it is disturbing to learn that:
a.) 18% of married couples 65+ earn less than $15,000; b.) 27% of
households 65-74 are below 200% of poverty; and c.) 40% of households
75+ have incomes below 200% of poverty.
Given well-known increases in
costs over the years, it is not surprising that so many older
Vermonters are now struggling. Since 2002, the cumulative cost of
living adjustment for Social Security was 17%. During that same
period, rents grew by 32%, heating oil 113%, natural gas 89%, and
gasoline 26% (this includes the recent decline in some prices).
As evident below, the costs
just for the most basic needs are substantial and these calculations
are made on a conservative basis.
Elder Economic Security Standard
Annual Expenses
Elder Person
Elder Couple
Owner w/o mortgage
Owner w/mortgage
Renter
(1 BR)
Owner w/o mortgage
Owner w/mortgage
Renter
(1 BR)
Elder
Standard per year (urban)
$20,233
$29,139
$23,605
$28,036
$36,936
$31,409
Elder
Standard per year (rural)
$21,883
$30,782
$22,246
$28,974
$37,872
$29,337
Average
urban & rural
$21,058
$29,961
$22,926
$28,505
$37,404
$30,373
Figures assume the elders are in
"good health" and do not include the cost of any
long-term care
needs.
Demographic,
Economic, and Social Measures
82,771
Population 65 years and older (13% of total population)
57,851
Households with at least one person 65 or older (23% of all HH)
$1,075
Average monthly Social Security retirement benefit
81%
Percent of households w/householder 65 or older that are owner
occupied
19%
Percent of households w/householder 65 or older that rent
36%
Percent 65 and older paying 30% or more of income for owner-occupied
housing costs
31,083
Population 65 and older with a disability (38% of all elders)
27%
Percent employed ages 65 to 74
70%
Percent of those 65 and older below poverty who are women
19%
Percent of those 65 – 74 who are veterans
The AARP funded research was
guided by advocates from the Community of Vermont Elders (COVE), The
Vermont Commission on Women and the Peace and Justice Center. It was
conducted by Doug Hoffer, a Vermont economic and policy analyst based
in Burlington. For a copy of the report and more comparative
data, contact Dave Reville at AARP Vermont at 802-951-1303 or dreville@aarp.org.