Alert
Close

You could win $50,000! First step — an easy retirement quiz. Try AARP's Perfect Path to Retirement Giveaway now!

Donate

Be part of the solution

Help AARP Foundation win back opportunity for struggling Americans 50+.

 

Donate button

Charity Ratings

AARP Foundation earns high ratings for accountability and transparency from two leading charity evaluators. Read

Sign Up for Our
Newsletter

View Current Issue

The AARP Foundation Litigation Update, our quarterly email newsletter, provides information about our current activities and cases.

Connect with the
Foundation

Email:

foundation@aarp.org

 

Toll-free Nationwide:

888-OUR-AARP

(888-687-2277)

 

Toll-free TTY:

877-434-7598

Magner v. Gallagher

What Constitutes Housing Discrimination?

    

What’s at Stake

The Fair Housing Act is a critical tool that removes impediments to the ability of people to age in place in their homes and communities by allowing them to challenge all types of discrimination in the housing market. If the ability of those affected by discrimination to bring cases under a disparate impact theory were limited or ended, older people would no longer be able to challenge neutral policies that had clearly discriminatory affects based on disability, race or other protected classes. It would be harder to challenge many potentially illegal practices that limit their options for long term residential care and lives of dignity and independence as they age.

Disparate impact tests enable a wider range of workable long term care solutions in assisted living facilities, and other types of residences where people choose to live together or to have their services delivered. Discrimination against older residents and homeowners who are minorities and people with disabilities that impede their ability to age in their homes and communities are often dressed up in what appear to be neutral policies. The rights of these people are threatened unless disparate impact challenges under the FHA remain cognizable.

Status of the Case

Magner v. Gallagher was before the U.S. Supreme Court until it was withdrawn by petitioners.

Topic Alerts

You can get weekly email alerts on the topics below. Just click “Follow.”

Manage Alerts

Processing

Please wait...

progress bar, please wait
  • Text
  • Print
  • Recommend

Search Legal Advocacy

Find
Legal Cases

Find the most recent cases in which AFL has advocated in courts nationwide for the rights of older persons, and filed AARP’s amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs that help courts decide precedent-setting cases.

About
Foundation Litigation

AARP Foundation Litigation (AFL) is an advocate in courts nationwide for the rights of people 50 and older, addressing diverse legal issues that affect their daily lives and assuring that they have a voice in the judicial system. Learn more about our litigation teams.