DONATE

Be part of the solution.

Help AARP Foundation win back opportunity for struggling Americans 50 and over.

Charity Rating

AARP Foundation earns high rating for accountability from a leading charity evaluator. Read

Connect with the
Foundation

Email:

foundation@aarp.org


AARP Foundation Litigation:

202-434-2060


Toll-free Nationwide:

888-OUR-AARP

(888-687-2277)

 

Toll-free TTY:

877-434-7598

 

AARP Foundation Tax ID

52-0794300

AARP Foundation Legal Advocacy

Docket: Recent Case Activity (Filed / Decided)

Case Name: Chamber of Commerce v. DOL and Perez

Court: U.S. Dist. Ct. ND Tex.  Docket: 16-1476, 16-1530, 16-1537 consolidated

Decided: 2/9/2017

Read Summary and AARP's Memorandum (PDF)

Case Result: The decision rejected all of the challenges to the Department of Labor's conflict of interest regulation, thereby upholding the rule.

Case Name: Freeman v. Rahn

Court: Md. Fed. Dist. Ct. N. Div.  Docket: G15-cv-00149

Court Approved Settlement: 2/3/2017

Read Summary and Settlement

Case Result: AFL favorably settled claims that the Maryland Transit Authority paratransit eligibility and telephone reservation systems violated the ADA.

Case Name: Kleber v. CareFusion

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 7th Cir. Docket: 17-1206

Filed: 2/1/2017

Case Issue: Does the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) allow job applicants to challenge hiring practices (here a "maximum years of experience" requirement) that unreasonably screens out older applicants without expressly disfavoring them based on their age.

Case Name: IMDb.com v. Becerra

Court: U.S. Dist Ct. ND Cal.    Docket: 16-cv-06536-VC

Filed: 1/25/2017

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Is California law mandating that entertainment employment service providers remove age data within five days of an entertainment worker's request constitutional? 

Case Name: EEOC v. Flambeau

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 7th Cir.   Docket: 16-1402

Decided: 1/25/2017

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: The court found that it could not decide the merits of the case because the company no longer required employees to participate in its wellness program to secure health insurance.

Case Name: Impression Products v. Lexmark International

Court: U.S. Supreme Ct.  Docket: 15-1189

Filed: 1/23/2017

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF) and Article

Case Issue: Can a business that owns a patent restrict the use or resale of its products, after the product has been sold?

Case Name: Kleber v. CareFusion

Court: U.S. Dist. Ct. ND Ill.  Docket: 15-cv-01994

Stipulation of Dismissal Filed: 01/10/2017

Read Complaint (PDF)

Case Result: AFL settled Mr.Kleber's disparate treatment claim and will now appeal CareFusion's refusal to consider his job application because he was "overqualified" - i.e., had more experience than the seven-year limit stated in the job notice - as a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by excluding older workers without a reasonable justification.

Some of the content presented here is in Adobe PDF format. You will need the free Acrobat Reader to access these files.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Topic Alerts

You can get weekly email alerts on the topics below. Just click “Follow.”

Manage Alerts

Processing

Please wait...

progress bar, please wait

Search Legal Advocacy

Find
Legal Cases

Find cases in which AFL has advocated in courts nationwide for the rights of older persons, and filed AARP’s amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs that help courts decide precedent-setting cases. The cases within the drop-down categories below are in alphabetical order for ease of searching.

Strengthening Law and Policy through
Legal Advocacy

Our legal advocacy initiatives  - conducted by AARP Foundation Litigation (AFL) - reflect nearly 20 years of work in federal and state courts across the country. Through our efforts, we support the Foundation’s four impact areas: Tackling Senior Hunger, Paving the Way to Stable Income, assuring the adequacy and availability of Safe and Afffordable Housing and Reconnecting People to Families and Communities, and ensure that those 50 and older have a voice in the laws and policies that affect their daily lives.