DONATE

Be part of the solution.

Help AARP Foundation win back opportunity for struggling Americans 50 and over.

Charity Rating

AARP Foundation earns high rating for accountability from a leading charity evaluator. Read

Connect with the
Foundation

Email:

foundation@aarp.org


AARP Foundation Litigation:

202-434-2060


Toll-free Nationwide:

888-OUR-AARP

(888-687-2277)

 

Toll-free TTY:

877-434-7598

 

AARP Foundation Tax ID

52-0794300

AARP Foundation Legal Advocacy

Docket: Other

    

Case Name: Arizona v. Inter-Tribal Council of Arizona

Court: U.S. Supreme Court

Read Summary and Brief

Case Result: Arizona's requirement that persons registering to vote must provide documentary proof of citizenship not required by the Federal Form, violates the U.S. Constitution Elections Clause. 

Case Name: Astrue v. Ratliff

Court: U.S. Supreme Court  Docket: 08-1322

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: Attorney's fees are payable to a litigant, not their attorney; as a result it is permissible for the federal government to seize the money to satisfy a debt the litigant owes the federal government.

Case Name: D.L. v. District of Columbia

Court: U.S. Ct. App. D.C. Cir.  Docket: 111-7153 & 12-7042

Read Summary AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Does a putative class sufficiently demonstrate "commonality," by showing "significant proof" that defendants "operated under a general policy of discrimination."

Case Name: Fair Political Practices Comm'n v. Americans for Responsible Leadership

Court: Ct. App. State of Cal.  Docket: C 072392

Read Summary AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: Court upheld order that group must disclose records identifying anonymous donors.

Case Name: Guardianship of the Estate and Person of Ryan Keith Tonner, (In re)

Court: Tex. Supreme Court   Docket: 07-13-00308

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Should courts consider least restrictive means, such as supported decision-making, when determining whether guardianship is warranted?

Case Name: Haynes v. Mattingly

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 2d Cir.    Docket: 14-3999

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Do foster care parents who are biologically related to a child in their care have a constitutional right to a prompt hearing when the child is removed by a government agency?

Case Name: Kobach v. U.S. Election Assistance Commission

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 10th Cir.    Docket: 14-3062

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Did court err in granting an injunction requiring the EAC to accept and use state-specific instructions in the Federal Voter Registration Form, notwihtstanding provisions of the National Voter Registration Act assigning to the EAC responsibility for determining, in consultation with the states, the content of the Federal Form?

Case Name: Kobach v. U.S. Election Assistance Commission

Court: U.S. Dist. Ct. Kan.    Docket: 13-4095

Read Summary

Case Result: Injunction granted in favor of Kansas and Arizona requiring EAC to allow state-specific directions to be added to the Federal Voter Registration Form to require documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote in federal elections.

Case Name: League of Women Voters Education Network v. Walker

Court: Wisc. Ct. App. Dist. IV   Docket: 12 AP 584

Read Summary AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Does state's Photo ID Law violate the state constitution which establishes voter qualifications?

Case Name: Lovlace v. Copley

Court: Tenn. Supreme Court  Docket: M2011-00170-SC-R11-CV

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF) 

Case Result:  When a grandparent or parent initiates a proceeding to modify or terminate court-ordered grandparent visitation, courts should apply the burdens of proof and standards typically applied in parent-vs-parent modification cases.

Case Name: McCutcheon v. Federal Election Comm'n

Court: U.S. Supreme Court  Docket: 12-536

Read Summary AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result:  Aggregate contribution limits to federal candidates established by the Federal Elections Campaign Act of 1971 violated the First Amendment.

Case Name: Milwaukee Branch of the NAACP v. Walker

Court: Wisc. Ct. App. Dist. II  Docket: 2012-AP-1652

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF) 

Case Issue:  Does Wisconsin Photo ID Voting Law violate the state constitution by imposing undue burdens on voters to exercise the franchise?

Case Name: Mont. Educ. Ass'n - MFT v. Fox

Court: Mont. Supreme Court   Docket: OP 13-0808

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: Title of legislative referendum is misleading and must be remanded to AG for correction.

Case Name: Shelby County v. Holder

Court: U.S. Supreme Court  Docket: 12-96

Read Summary AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF) 

Case Result: The coverage formula in Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act determining which political jurisdictions were subject to the "preclearance" requirements was based on outdated criteria, and therefore unconstitutional.

Case Name: Veasey v. Abbott

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 5th Cir.  Docket: 14-41127

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue:  Did state "photo ID" voting law violate U.S. Constitution and Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act?

No. of chars for this Text and Image component: 186

Some of the content presented here is in Adobe PDF format. You will need the free Acrobat Reader to access these files.

Topic Alerts

You can get weekly email alerts on the topics below. Just click “Follow.”

Manage Alerts

Processing

Please wait...

progress bar, please wait

Search Legal Advocacy

Find
Legal Cases

Find the most recent cases in which AFL has advocated in courts nationwide for the rights of older persons, and filed AARP’s amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs that help courts decide precedent-setting cases.

Strengthening Law and Policy through
Legal Advocacy

Our legal advocacy initiatives  - conducted by AARP Foundation Litigation (AFL) - reflect more than 15 years of work in federal and state courts across the country. Through our efforts, we support the Foundation’s four priority areas: Hunger, Income, Housing and Isolation, and ensure that those 50 and older have a voice in the laws and policies that affect their daily lives.