Case Name: Edwards Lifesciences AG v. Medtronic Corevalve
Court: U.S. Ct. App. Fed Cir. Docket: 2014-1409
Case Reult: Settlement allows patients unrestricted access to Medtronic's heart valve system.
Case Name: Nautilus v. Biosig Instruments
Court: U.S. Supreme Court Docket: 13-369
Case Result: The "insolubly ambiguous" test created by the federal circuit for patents is improper.
Case Name: Halbig v. Burwell (formerly Sebelius)
Court: U.S. Ct. App. D.C. Docket: 14-50118
Case Result: Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their challenge to the availability of federal tax credits to subsidize health care premiums after the U.S. Supreme Court upheld such subsidies in King v. Burwell.
Case Name: Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals v. Arkansas
Court: Supreme Court of Arkansas Docket: 12-1058
Case Result: Because Janssen is a pharmaceutical company and not a health care facility seeking certification or recertification, the award of penalties under the state Medicaid fraud law was reversed.
Case Name: McCall v. U.S.
Court: Fla. Supreme Court Docket: 11-1148
Case Result: State cap on non-economic damages in wrongful death actions held to violate the Equal Protection clause of the Florida constitution.
Case Name: Coleman v. Mariner Health Care, Inc.
Court: SC Ct. App. Docket: 2010-CP-21-00835, 2010-CP-21-00836
Case Result: Individual designated as a health care power of attorney is not authorized to sign an arbitration agreement on a patient's behalf.
Case Name: Univ. of Utah Research Found. v. Ambry Genetics
Court: U.S. Dist Ct. Utah Docket: 2:13 cv 00640 RJS
Case Result: Court denied request for preliminary injunction to block alternate genetic tests, finding that plaintiff was not likely to succeed on merits.
You can get weekly email alerts on the topics below. Just click “Follow.”Manage Alerts
Search Legal Advocacy
Find cases in which AFL has advocated in courts nationwide for the rights of older persons, and filed AARP’s amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs that help courts decide precedent-setting cases. The cases within the drop-down categories below are in alphabetical order for ease of searching.
Strengthening Law and Policy through
Our legal advocacy initiatives - conducted by AARP Foundation Litigation (AFL) - reflect more than 15 years of work in federal and state courts across the country. Through our efforts, we support the Foundation’s four impact areas: Tackling Senior Hunger, Paving the Way to Stable Income, assuring the adequacy and availability of Safe and Afffordable Housing and Reconnecting People to Families and Communities, and ensure that those 50 and older have a voice in the laws and policies that affect their daily lives.