Alert
Close

Last chance! Play brain games for a chance to win $25,000. Enter the Brain Health Sweepstakes

Donate

Be part of the solution.

Help AARP Foundation win back opportunity for struggling Americans 50 and over.

Charity Ratings

AARP Foundation earns high ratings for accountability and transparency from two leading charity evaluators. Read

Sign Up for Our
Newsletter

View Current Issue

The AARP Foundation Litigation Update, our quarterly email newsletter, provides information about our current activities and cases.

Connect with the
Foundation

Email:

foundation@aarp.org

 

Toll-free Nationwide:

888-OUR-AARP

(888-687-2277)

 

Toll-free TTY:

877-434-7598

AARP Foundation Legal Advocacy

Docket: Health

    

Case Name: Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. Pa. Dep't of Labor and Indus.

Court: Pa. Supreme Ct.    Docket: 67 MAP 2008

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF) 

Case Result: A third-party agency employer of home health care workers must pay overtime wages under state law.

Case Name: Bilski v. Kappos

Court: U.S. Supreme Court   Docket: 08-964

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: Court held that the claimed "business method" was not patent eligible but left unanswered which "business method" patents would be upheld in the future.

Case Name: Caraco Pharm. Laboratories v. Novo Nordisk A/S

Court: U.S. Supreme Court     Docket:  10-844

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: Generic drug maker may bring counterclaim under Hatch-Waxman Act against brand Rx manufacturer in infringement suit to make brand correct misleading patent information supplied to FDA regarding use of the brand version of drug.

Case Name: Ctr. for Special Needs Trusts Admin. v. Olson

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 8th Cir    Docket: 11-2158

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: State's age restriction on pooled trusts for individuals over 65 was permitted by applicable Medicaid provision, but the letter of the federal agency is not due deference by the court.

Case Name: Coleman v. Mariner Health Care, Inc.

Court: SC Ct. App.    Docket: 2010-CP-21-00835, 2010-CP-21-00836

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Can an arbitration agreement be enforced against the estate of a deceased nursing facility resident when the resident's relative signed the agreement without a Power of Attorney?

Case Name: Corenbaum v. Lampkin

Court: Cal. Ct. App., 2d App. Dist.     Docket: B236227 & B237871

Read AARP's Amicus Brief  (PDF) 

Case Issue: Should jury review complete medical bill or only the amount paid by insurer when calculating non-economic damages and future medical expenses?

Case Name: Corum v. Roswell Senior Living Center, LLC

Court: N.M. Ct. App.    Docket: Ct. App. No. 28,314

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Brief  (PDF) 

Case Result: A surrogate decision-maker cannot bind a resident of an assistant living center or other long tern care facility to an arbitration agreement unless the surrogate's authority is appropriately designated pursuant to the Uniform Health Care Decision Act.

Case Name: Darling v. Douglas

Court: U.S. Dist. Ct. ND Cal.  Docket: #c 09-03798

Read Injunction 1 Summary, Injunction 2 Summary, Settlement Summary

Case Result: Litigation successfully resulted in two preliminary injunctions and a settlement agreement. Parties continue to litigate ongoing compliance issues.

Some of the content presented here is in Adobe PDF format. You will need the free Acrobat Reader to access these files.

Topic Alerts

You can get weekly email alerts on the topics below. Just click “Follow.”

Manage Alerts

Processing

Please wait...

progress bar, please wait
  • Text
  • Print
  • Recommend

Search Legal Advocacy

Find
Legal Cases

Find the most recent cases in which AFL has advocated in courts nationwide for the rights of older persons, and filed AARP’s amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs that help courts decide precedent-setting cases.

About
Foundation Litigation

AARP Foundation Litigation (AFL) is an advocate in courts nationwide for the rights of people 50 and older, addressing diverse legal issues that affect their daily lives and assuring that they have a voice in the judicial system. Learn more about our litigation teams.