Case Name: Mach Mining v. EEOC
Court: U.S. Supreme Court Docket: 13-1019
Case Result: Courts may conduct only a narrow review before suing an employer in a Title VII case and failure to conciliate does not requrie dismissal.
Case Name: Squyres v. The Heico Companies
Court: U.S. Ct. App. 5th Cir. Docket: 13-11358
Case Result: The court affirmed summary judgment concluding that employer's explanation for the plaintiff's termination was credible and that age-related comments by plaintiff's co-workers did not demonstrate age-based animus against him.
Case Name: Phillips v. NYPD
Court: U.S. Dist. Ct. SDNY Docket: 11-6685
Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)
Case Result: Settlement allows police officers to return to work using their hearing aids and other officers will be permitted to take auditory examination using hearing aids.
Case Name: Jacob v. Duane Reade
Court: U.S. Ct. App. 2d Cir. Docket: 13-3873-cv
Case Result: District court properly certified class action on behalf of assistant store managers in overtime pay case under N.Y. wage and hour law.
Case Name: Hilde v. City of Eveleth
Court: U.S. Ct. App. 8th Cir. Docket: S14-1016
Case Result: It is improper to consider a candidate's eligibility for retirement when making a hiring decision because assuming an individual is uncommitted to a position when their age makes them retirement-eligible is prohibited age-stereotyping.
Case Name: Braun v. Walmart
Court: Pa. Supreme Court Docket: 32 EAP 2012
Case Result: Statistical evidence can be used to prove damages and it was not required to prove that the claims of all class members were identical.
Case Name: McDaniel v. Momentive Inc.
Court: U.S. Ct. App. 5th Cir. Docket: 14-20410, 14-20462
Case Result: Parties entered into confidential settlement and dismissed appeal before oral argument.
You can get weekly email alerts on the topics below. Just click “Follow.”Manage Alerts
Search Legal Advocacy
Find cases in which AFL has advocated in courts nationwide for the rights of older persons, and filed AARP’s amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs that help courts decide precedent-setting cases. The cases within the drop-down categories below are in alphabetical order for ease of searching.
Strengthening Law and Policy through
Our legal advocacy initiatives - conducted by AARP Foundation Litigation (AFL) - reflect more than 15 years of work in federal and state courts across the country. Through our efforts, we support the Foundation’s four impact areas: Tackling Senior Hunger, Paving the Way to Stable Income, assuring the adequacy and availability of Safe and Afffordable Housing and Reconnecting People to Families and Communities, and ensure that those 50 and older have a voice in the laws and policies that affect their daily lives.