Be part of the solution.

Help AARP Foundation win back opportunity for struggling Americans 50 and over.

Charity Rating

AARP Foundation earns high rating for accountability from a leading charity evaluator. Read

Connect with the


AARP Foundation Litigation:


Toll-free Nationwide:




Toll-free TTY:



AARP Foundation Tax ID


AARP Foundation Legal Advocacy

Docket: Employment Discrimination


Case Name: Alch v. Time Warner Entertainment Co., Inc.

Court: Cal. Superior Ct., County of LA, Cent. Civ. W. Docket: BC 268836

Read Summary

Case Result: The last of the 23 class actions comprising the Television Writers Age Discrimination Litigation has settled. Without admitting liability, the 51 defendants agreed to pay a combined total of $75 million making it the largest in the history of age discrimination litigation.

Case Name: Baker v. Beckton, Dickinson & Co.

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 6th Cir.    Docket: 11-6273

Read Summary AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: Court held that it did not need to rule on whether ageist comments of plaintiff's supervisor were direct evidence of discrimination because the remarks were nevertheless sufficient indirect (circumstantial) evidence of discrimination to create a genuine issue of material fact regarding the defendant's discriminatory intent.

Case Name: Braun v. Walmart

Court: Pa. Supreme Court    Docket: 32 EAP 2012

Read Summary AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: Statistical evidence can be used to prove damages and it was not required to prove that the claims of all class members were identical.

Case Name: Calobrisi v. Booz Allen Hamilton

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 4th Cir.    Docket: 15-1331(1); 15-1399 XAP

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Did the district court misapply the Supreme Court's decision in Sprint v. Mendelsohn (2008), by disregarding Calobrisi's evidence of her employer's "corporate culture" of ageism?

Case Name: Coleman v. Maryland Ct. of App.

Court: U.S. Supreme Court    Docket: 10-1016

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: The 11th Amendment sovereign immunity bars suits against states under the Family and Medical Leave Act for damages from discrimination in the form of denial of personal medical leave and/or retaliation for taking such leave.

Case Name: Daniak v. Northeast Medical Group

Court: Superior Court J.D. of New Haven    Docket: NNH-CV-14-6047134-5

Case Issue: Is it unlawful age discrimination to ask a qualified, high-performing professional to retire and then terminate him when he declines?

Case Name: Duran v. U.S. Bank National

Court: Cal. Supreme Ct.    Docket: S200923

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: Statistical sampling may provide an appropriate means of proving liability and damages in some wage and hour class actions.

Case Name: Flynn v. Distinctive Home Care

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 5th Cir.   Docket: 15-50314

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Does the Rehabilitation Act cover disability-based discrimination against independent contractors?

Case Name: Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk

Court: U.S. Supreme Court    Docket: 11-1059

Read Summary AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: Plaintiff who rejected a settlement offer had no personal interest in representing unnamed claimants, nor any other continuing interest that would preserve her suit from mootness and; therefore, her suit was appropriately dismissed.

Case Name: Godwin v. WellStar Health System

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 11th Cir.    Docket: 14-11637

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: The 11th circuit reversed summary judgment for the employer on the employee's ADEA claim under the "Cat's Paw" theory of liability, but affirmed summary judgment for the employer on the employee's disability discrimination and retaliation claims.

Case Name: Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.

Court: U.S. Supreme Court    Docket: 08-441

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: Unlike Title VII, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act does not permit mixed-motive claims and, therefore, in order to establish liability under the ADEA, the plaintiff must prove that age was the "but-for" cause of the adverse employment action.

Topic Alerts

You can get weekly email alerts on the topics below. Just click “Follow.”

Manage Alerts


Please wait...

progress bar, please wait

Search Legal Advocacy

Legal Cases

Find the most recent cases in which AFL has advocated in courts nationwide for the rights of older persons, and filed AARP’s amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs that help courts decide precedent-setting cases.

Strengthening Law and Policy through
Legal Advocacy

Our legal advocacy initiatives  - conducted by AARP Foundation Litigation (AFL) - reflect more than 15 years of work in federal and state courts across the country. Through our efforts, we support the Foundation’s four priority areas: Hunger, Income, Housing and Isolation, and ensure that those 50 and older have a voice in the laws and policies that affect their daily lives.