Case Name: Leimkuehler v. American United Life Ins.
Court: U.S. Dist. Ct. S. Ind. Docket: 1:10-CV-333-JMS-TAB
Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)
Case Issue: Should court award attorney's fees to prevailing defendant in suit by plan trustee for breach of fiduciary duty by plan administrator for failing to disclose receipt of revenue sharing payments from mutual funds and that its fund class selection decisions were influenced by amount of revenue sharing payable to fiduciary by fund?
Case Name: McLean v. State of California
Court: Supreme Court of California Docket: S221554
Case Issue: Are retiring employees who are paid late entitled to wage penalties under the same terms as employees who "quit"?
Case Name: Montanile v. Bd. of Trustees, National Elevator Industry Health Benefit Plan
Court: U.S. Supreme Court Docket: 14-723
Case Issue: Can a lawsuit, seeking equitable relief under ERISA to recover an alleged overpayment by a plan, be brought if a fiduciary has not identified a particular fund in a participant's possession and control at the time the fiduciary asserts the claim?
Case Name: Moro v. State of Oregon
Court: Supreme Court of Oregon Docket: S061452
Case Result: The Supreme Court of Orego held that the legislature was within its right to end favorable state tax treatment of pension benefits and that while retroactive changes to COLAs were invalid, prospective changes were permitted.
Case Name: Rhode Island Pub. Employees' Reitree Coalition v. Chafee
Court: RI Superior Ct. Docket: PC12-3166
Case Issue: A Rhode Island Superior Court judge approved a proposed class-action settlement, finding that the proposed settlement was fair, reasonable, and adequate.
Case Name: Rochow v. LINA
Court: U.S. Ct. App. 6th Cir. Docket: 12-2074
Case Result: Absent a showing that the remedy for denial of benefits remedy is inadequate to make plaintiff whole, a recovery for disgorgement of profits is unavailable under ERISA.
You can get weekly email alerts on the topics below. Just click “Follow.”Manage Alerts
Search Legal Advocacy
Find cases in which AFL has advocated in courts nationwide for the rights of older persons, and filed AARP’s amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs that help courts decide precedent-setting cases. The cases within the drop-down categories below are in alphabetical order for ease of searching.
Strengthening Law and Policy through
Our legal advocacy initiatives - conducted by AARP Foundation Litigation (AFL) - reflect more than 15 years of work in federal and state courts across the country. Through our efforts, we support the Foundation’s four impact areas: Tackling Senior Hunger, Paving the Way to Stable Income, assuring the adequacy and availability of Safe and Afffordable Housing and Reconnecting People to Families and Communities, and ensure that those 50 and older have a voice in the laws and policies that affect their daily lives.