Be part of the solution.

Help AARP Foundation win back opportunity for struggling Americans 50 and over.

Charity Rating

AARP Foundation earns high rating for accountability from a leading charity evaluator. Read

Connect with the


AARP Foundation Litigation:


Toll-free Nationwide:




Toll-free TTY:



AARP Foundation Tax ID


AARP Foundation Legal Advocacy

Docket: Consumer and Utilities


Case Name: ACA Int'l v. FCC

Court: U.S. Ct. App. D.C. Cir. Docket: 15-1211

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Did the FCC impermissibly expand its authority to implement the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TPCA). The TCPA applies to any prerecorded message delivered by an autodialer that has the capacity to store and make calls to consumers without human intervention; the TCPA does not allow calls to cell phone numbers that have been reassigned to a new user (after the first call), and; consumers have the right to revoke, by any reasonable means, consent to receive prerecorded messages delivered by autodialers?

Case Name: Bank of America v. Caulkett and Bank of American v. Toledo-Cardona

Court: U.S. Supreme Court Docket: 13-1421 and 14-163

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Does the Bankrupcy Code, which provides that a lien in excess of the value of the collateral is "void" - permit a Chapter 7 debtor to extinguish a mortgage lien on his personal residence where the collateral to which the lien attaches is found to have no value?

Case Name: Berman v. City of New York

Court: N.Y. Ct. App.  Docket: CTQ-2014-07

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: A New York city law that requires attorneys regularly engaged in debt collection to be licensed, is not preempted by the state's regulation of lawyers.

Case Name: Board's Investigation Regarding the Reclassification (N.J. Verizon Deregulation)

Court: N.J. Superior Ct. Docket: A-004769-14T2

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: The court deferred to and affirmed the decision of the Board of Public Utilities to deregulate and reclassify four telephone services provided by Verizon as competitive.

Case Name: Cabral v. Supple

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 9th Cir. Docket: 13-55943

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Was it proper to certify a class of people who claim that Supple falsely advertised that its special juice will "completely reverse and halt the disease process" for any joint disease?

Case Name: Campbell-Ewald v. Gomez

Court: U.S. Supreme Court  Docket: 14-857

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: An unaccepted settlement offer or offer of judgment made pursuant to F.R.C.P. 68 does not moot a plaintiff's case.

Case Name: Caplinger v. Medtronic

Court: U.S. Supreme Court  Docket: 15-321

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Issue: Are state law claims against a medical device manufacturer based on injuries caused by a medical device preempted where the device was not granted premarket approval for the particular use that caused the injuries and the manufacturer marketed the device for that unapproved use?

Case Name: Ciser v. Nestle

Court: U.S. Ct. App. 3d Cir.  Docket: 13-4509

Read Summary and AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: The judgment of the district court dismissing plaintiff's claims for failure to plead a cognizable claim was affirmed because the third circuit found, not action to recover voluntarily paid but allegedly unreasonable late fees exists at common law, and actions to challenge unconscionable conduct under the N.J. Consumer Fraud Act must allege an element of deceptive conduct. Because the late fees were disclosed in Nestle's contract, they may not be challenged as an unconscionable practice.

Case Name: Citizens, State of Florida v. Graham

Court: Fla. Supreme Court    Docket: SC 15-95

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result: The court reversed an order of the Florida Public Services Commission (PSC) that allowed Florida Power and Light to pass on to ratepayers the costs of its exploration and hydraulic fracturing operations in Oklahoma because the state legislature had not granted the PSC suthority to regulate out-of-state operations.

Case Name: Coleman v. District of Columbia

Court: U.S. Dist. Ct. D.C.  Docket: 13-01456-EGS

Read AARP's Amicus Brief (PDF)

Case Result:  The district court denied the motion for judgment on the pleadings, finding that the plaintiffs stated claim of taking without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, where the plaintiffs cited sources of law establishing a recognized property interest in home equity.

Some of the content presented here is in Adobe PDF format. You will need the free Acrobat Reader to access these files.

Topic Alerts

You can get weekly email alerts on the topics below. Just click “Follow.”

Manage Alerts


Please wait...

progress bar, please wait

Search Legal Advocacy

Legal Cases

Find cases in which AFL has advocated in courts nationwide for the rights of older persons, and filed AARP’s amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs that help courts decide precedent-setting cases. The cases within the drop-down categories below are in alphabetical order for ease of searching.

Strengthening Law and Policy through
Legal Advocacy

Our legal advocacy initiatives  - conducted by AARP Foundation Litigation (AFL) - reflect nearly 20 years of work in federal and state courts across the country. Through our efforts, we support the Foundation’s four impact areas: Tackling Senior Hunger, Paving the Way to Stable Income, assuring the adequacy and availability of Safe and Afffordable Housing and Reconnecting People to Families and Communities, and ensure that those 50 and older have a voice in the laws and policies that affect their daily lives.